The Status of Health Freedom in America
Dec. 16, 2024
Host: Hon. Sam Rohrer
Guest: Twila Brase
Note: This transcript is taken from a Stand in the Gap Today program aired on 12/16/24. To listen to the podcast, click HERE.
Disclaimer: While reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate transcription, the following is a representation of a mechanical transcription and as such, may not be a word for word transcript. Please listen to the audio version for any questions concerning the following dialogue.
Sam Rohrer:
Hello and welcome to this Monday edition of Stand In the Gap Today. This is also our monthly focus on health freedom with recurring guest Twila Braves, president and co-founder of Citizens Council for Health Freedom with a website@cchfreedom.org. But before I bring in Twila for a focus on today’s program that I’ve entitled The Status of Health Freedom in America, looking back and looking ahead, and we’re doing that at the end of the year, I’d like to comment on two leading issues. I think of greatest consequence that I believe came out of the December 7th, that’s last weekend, not the one yesterday and before, but the one before the weekend news cycle of that weekend in which I feel continued to dominate this past weekend news cycle. Now as I dealt with last week in substantive form on Monday with military intel strategist and Navy Seal trainer JR McGee, and then part again on Wednesday with independent research journalist Leo Hohmann, the leading domestic issue I believe.
And we all tended to agree that it’s the continued sightings of drones across America now shutting down some airports for periods of time, even yesterday, then shutting down for a period of time the airspace of Wright Patterson Air Force Base. That’s right. So while on this program, we were ahead of the general news media last Monday, public awareness of these unidentified entities has now so expanded that it’s being reported on news reports of all types and is broad-based, not just here but even globally. So to this point, all government entities, official government entities are denying any knowledge of these drones origin with leading speculation with basis for this, that origin and purpose range from nefarious enemy nation surveillance, including possibly joint efforts by China, Russia, and Iran with has to be complicity with deep state in our own government. That was one or two, a secret Department of Defense surveillance effort to sniff out and find a possible dirty bomb of some type.
Now these two are both in the narrative. In any event, what is happening is destroying, in my opinion, any remaining trust in government and it’s making people more anxious by the day. I think it’s by design frankly. The biblical response to all of this though must be do not give in to the spirit of fear, but be prepared also to expect the unexpected. And here’s the verse, trust in the Lord with all our heart. That applies to me too and lean not into our own understanding and all our ways acknowledge God in fear and obedience and he will guide our thoughts and actions of that we can be sure. Now, the second issue is the changing landscape in the Middle East as the result of the fall of Damascus. And I’ll discuss this issue in greater detail on our bimonthly focus on Israel prophecy in the Middle East on Wednesday with special guest Dr. Bill Salus. However, in this regard, let me say that what we discussed on Monday and Wednesday from our perspective was that this fall of Syria, out of that would emerge a stronger Turkey nation of Turkey. And as we speak, I think we see this happening, but we’ll do more on that on Wednesday on that theme. Now with this being said, let me shift gears to the matter of the status of health freedom in America. Looking back, looking ahead and I’ll invite in right now, Twilight Twila brace. Thanks for being back with me.
Twila Brase:
Well, it’s always good to be here, Sam. Thanks so much.
Sam Rohrer:
You are welcome. Well Twila. All right, you are the expert on matters of health Freedom 2024 has been an extraordinarily eventful year and it’s not done. 2025 promises some hope, but much continued uncertainty as well. But for this purpose right now, would you as the one in this space, most more than anybody, look back and then in the balance of program, we’ll look ahead but do it this way. If you consider 2024 in a continuum as it relates to health freedom, could you identify the 1, 2, 3 leading gains that we saw in this area and then perhaps the top one, two or three losses in regard to health freedom?
Twila Brase:
Okay, well, I might have a few more than one, two or three, but okay, I’ll just be quick. So I think that Trump winning the election was a huge gain because Harris would’ve taken us into a Medicare for All system even though she was claiming that she wasn’t going to do it. I think the US Supreme Court ruling for an end of the Chevron deference and the Chevron deference said that they would basically look at the bureaucrats and think that the bureaucrats were right when issues came, and now that’s no longer the case. They won’t consider the Democrats view, Democrats, sorry, the bureaucrats view to be primary and they won’t give them any deference, the successful lawsuits against vaccine mandates and against employers and others. And then, well, I suppose we could consider our Medicare how to guide as being one of the gains because people all around the country are learning why they should not go into Medicare Advantage and that’s good.
When it comes to losses back in the Medicare Advantage sphere, there are 54% of people in Medicare that are the Medicare advantage plans and most of them don’t understand that this is actually not a good idea. And so that’s a loss. That number continues to grow and it should be reversed. I would say that Medicare just this year started paying doctors to profile their patients with the social determinants of health questionnaires. And this is essentially going to create dossiers on the American people through the exam room. The doctor shortage is just growing because doctors don’t really like the situation that they’re in, using artificial intelligence in the exam room to try and decrease the number of staff or to try to, I don’t know, perhaps control what the doctors do. I think this is of great concern. A lot of people are very concerned about artificial intelligence in the exam room. And then Biden did something in 2024 in September. He limited short term limited duration plans, which are these plans that help people who really can’t afford insurance, but they last for like a year and he limited them to only three months. And so some people it takes longer to find a job than three months, but under Biden you wouldn’t have it. But under Trump, I think it was three years. So we can hope that something will change in 2025.
Sam Rohrer:
Twila, you did a great job and we’re about out of time, so I’m not going to go much deeper on that. But ladies and gentlemen, we will talk a little bit more about the Medicare because you mentioned that twice gains because of your Medicare guide and frankly twice I’ve had a number of people come up and ask me specifically in regard to hearing us talk about this on other programs about that guide. So kudos very good and we’ll talk about some of these other things, ladies and gentlemen, perhaps in the balance of the program as we shift mostly from looking back and just getting a recap. And that was tough for you to do, but I think it was great job and we shift here at the balance of the program to looking ahead and getting some input from Twila on a number of key issues. We’ll do that as we come back in just a moment.
Ladies and gentlemen, if you’re just joining us, thanks for being on board with us. Twila Braze is my special guest today. This is our monthly focus on health freedom we call it. Again, if you might be new to the program, we have a number of issues that we repeat every month. Like for instance, every other Wednesday we focus on Israel prophecy in the Middle East. This Wednesday day after tomorrow will be another one of those days. We will focus on matters of apologetics and creation, do that once a month with special guests. We focus on matters concerning the constitution in American history. Those two work together very well. That’s a bimonthly every other Thursday. That’s with constitutional attorney David New, and we will do that on Thursday this week. So I just mentioned a few of those things and you can find all of those programs if you were to examine and want to, and some listeners have been asking for that about how to do that.
You just go to the website and go on the top of the page, either on the app or on the website and look for that little inquiry sign there at the top or ask questions. And then you can just put in a guest name. For instance, you can put in Twila’s name or my guest today or put in a name of Carl Broggi as an example and put it in there. And then it’ll give you all of the programs where they have been featured and that’s been very, very helpful. So I just throw that out there to you at the moment. But Twila, let’s go here. We want to look ahead on matters of health freedom important to all of our listeners, but following the November 5th election, you and your team wrote what are terming an open letter to President-elect Donald Trump. And we’ve talked about that briefly in previous programs, but I would like to find out from you now, have you heard back as an example, why did you write that letter? What did it say? And just give us a current status of that open letter.
Twila Brase:
Well, essentially I said that I knew he had to make lots of decisions regarding healthcare and that healthcare is complex. And I gave some examples of the fact that medical terms often do not mean or healthcare policy terms do not mean what most Americans think. They mean like HIPAA, which people think has to do with protecting privacy. But it actually eliminated your privacy rights. And I asked for a 15 minute meeting because I think I could do it in 15 minutes. And then I said sort of cryptically, I guess I could say that healthcare suffers from a primary disease and that we have seven suggestions which align with constitutional principles, including one of our big issues, which is letting Americans opt out of Medicare. And so that was the gist of it. It was an open letter. We have not heard anything but really thought that was the first shot over the bow so that when everything gets actually figured out who is totally, which nominees actually make it through, who is hired, which people do we know that are hired, then we would hope to make this meeting happen. We’ll try an actual letter to President Trump, but we know everything from everything I hear in Washington DC the people that I know, everything is in kind of chaos at the moment. So we don’t want to waste the letter by sending it too soon.
Sam Rohrer:
And I would say someone who’s been in office for a long time that oftentimes people will send letters and they make a big deal about it, but they never go anywhere, they never really intended to go. So it’s more of a publicity event. In this case, I’m going to say what you did, I would concur that it was a good thing and it does get on the radar. In reality, I would see perhaps and hopefully that opening the door as you say, to one or more good eventual appointees in one or more departments. And I would hope that that would be the case. But good, and I’m glad that that’s on the record and I think our listeners need to know and frankly can pray about that wouldn’t be an appropriate thing to pray about. Alright, let’s move from there because not only that open letter, a request to share knowledge as gained as you do from folks at all levels all across the country, very appropriate because of some of the nominations by Donald Trump for the cabinet positions.
And our listeners aware of a lot of things know maybe they don’t, don’t know, but some let’s relate to health freedom. Some appointees, for instance, like RFK has been positively received by people concerned about health freedom. But unfortunately the President-elect has appointed at least two individuals to cabinet positions, which are frankly not given to protecting health freedom but to the opposite. And it is a complicating factor. So just with that set up, what letter did you write and then just talk about those couple of individuals in the departments to just build that whole thing out there and what’s now a part of this more focused letter that you’ve sent.
Twila Brase:
Okay, yes. So one word about RFK Junior where we do think he has freedom in mind when it comes to vaccines and food, although we don’t want him to go overboard on the food idea and start taking away freedom on food, right? Freedom should be the operating agenda here of the Trump administration, but we don’t really know where he’s at when it comes to things like Medicare, Medicaid, socialized medicine, all of that sort of thing. Obamacare insurance, we don’t know exactly where he is going, so we do have to look as well at his nominees and the nominees right now for surgeon in general, which is not that powerful of a position, but it’s still a person who can go around and be an ambassador for the president. And so right now, Jeanette, I think it’s, he has her for Surgeon General, but she was a strong advocate of censoring anybody who spoke out against the Covid shot.
She was really a fan of Facebook shutting down that kind of information. And so she is not the appropriate person to be in that position. And we told the president in this letter that we sent two weeks ago that he should reconsider that nomination and instead put the state, the Florida State Surgeon General, Dr. Joseph Ladapo in that position because he’s been very strong on the issue of freedom all throughout Covid. We also suggested to President Trump that he withdraw the nomination of, I don’t think we actually use withdraw. I think we said reconsider the nomination of Dr. Oz because Dr. Oz supports a national healthcare system. It’s very clear that he’s in with the health plans in 2020 when we were all just probably emerging from lockdown. He and a former CEO of a health plan wrote a op-ed in Forbes magazine in June, 2020 talking about how Medicare Advantage for All is the solution for healthcare in America. Well, that’s health plans for all. That’s Medicare Advantage, which is rationing care to seniors. And he advocated for a 20% payroll tax to fund it. So he is not the person who should, in our opinion, who should be in charge of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services. And we suggested instead Dr. Scott Atlas, who was the special advisor to Trump during the whole, well, not during the whole months during the Covid fiasco and was helping him understand the truth to counter Fauci and Burks.
Sam Rohrer:
Alright. All right. Great job on what you just did there. And I want to follow up and just have you restate a little bit because one of the things that you mentioned, and this is why as I say, there’s hope for going into 2025 because of the election of Donald Trump’s. It’d be so different than obviously a Kamala, but at the same time, this unknown, these unknowns relative to just this area of healthcare, as you said, RFK comes from a family that loved generally more socialistic medicine. And as you rightly point out, we don’t know where that’s going to go yet. And then these other two, including Dr. Oz, who obviously ran for Senate here in Pennsylvania and did not win, wasn’t even a Pennsylvania citizen frankly. But he raises that question that you talk about. So you would have to put on your radar as a real unknown because we don’t know where these people are on that. And anyway, just any further comments on that because I would suggest that this is one area that our people who know how to pray need to pray about because these appointments still are very much unknown.
Twila Brase:
Yes, I think there’s a lot of Americans who are just relieved and we should all be relieved that Trump won, but really what does it mean? And I believe there’s going to be a really huge battle. And I do remember hearing from Dr, well, I’ll just say a bureaucrat, a former bureaucrat of the EPA that went around and met all the staff during his first days and weeks in office or in this position. And this one woman introduced herself by saying that she was on the B team. And he said, well, what do you mean the B team? And she said, I’ll be here when you are gone. And so there’s not only, I mean these nominees come in, but they come into a whole cast and crew of bureaucrats under them who expect to continue on what they’re doing as soon as these nominees are gone and out of the picture.
Sam Rohrer:
That is another great point. And boy, we could go further on that. The bureaucracies, ladies and gentlemen, actually do much of the running of the country. They’re the ones that have no faces, but they tell you what to do. It does happen that way. When we come back, we’re going to switch and go to the area of health freedom and digitization, collection of information, real id, medical records and that kind of thing, all of which we’ve talked about, but all of which are going into 2025 as a real issue. Well, Twila, when I asked you in the first segment for, and I did write them down, I asked you for some of the gains for the year. You said the election of Trump, the win of the Chevron case, successful VAX lawsuits and the Medicare guide. We’ll talk about that last segment. I also asked you about some losses and one of those was the effort, the continued push by entities of the federal government to force doctors in the exam rooms to collect data on people sensitive health data.
You mentioned HIPAA as an example, as one thing, and then other matter even to the point now of using artificial intelligence and so forth. So there’s a number of things that revolve around information, private health information, doctors’ notes could be even possible, that kind of a thing. So I want to ask you right here on that, build this out a little bit, the electronic health records, we’ve talked about it a lot, but build that out a little bit with what if there’s fingers on this hand of data collection, what are the various fingers that are collecting? And again, what’s being collected and why is that harmful?
Twila Brase:
Well, people don’t understand what the electronic health record the EHR really is. And so in my book, big Brother in the exam room, I call it the government EHR because that’s what it is because it was imposed by Congress to do what Congress wants to do, which is to collect all of this information, to report all of this information to the government and others to control what happens in the exam room. And so the Obama administration, it was like one of the first bills that he signed this electronic health record mandate because they viewed it as the way or the foundation for a national healthcare system. If you nationalize the data, it’s easier to nationalize the system because you can control the doctors. And so doctors now have to have this government EHR in the exam room, in the hospital at the bedside, and they have to use it meaningfully.
There are meaningful use regulations and if they do not have it or they do not use it meaningfully, they lose money on every patient that they see. And then these electronic health records, because they digitize everybody’s data, they’re also in many clinics, many hospitals, people can look up to see if their own is included, but they’re in the eHealth Exchange, a nationwide national health information exchange system pay for by taxpayers. And so sometimes if you’re in the exam room and the person looking over your electronic health record says X, and you’ve never told them whatever that X is, and you wonder, well, how do they know? Well, it’s probably because they’re connected to the E-health exchange or to a state health information exchange and they’re just getting this data from wherever else you may have left it. So I think that EHRs aren’t bad on their own because doctors had them, doctors had them before the government EHR, and they did what the doctors wanted them to do, but now they’re there for the purpose of controlling the doctor’s hands and conducting surveillance on the exam room.
Sam Rohrer:
And I think that that’s excellent, ladies, gentlemen, I think you get that the only safe data is uncollected data. Just remember that that’s anything computer, anything that goes into the digitized system. So collecting data does not help the doctor, your physician, on any level give you better care. It just doesn’t. Why? Because it goes to the government and they try to come back and tell the doctor what is to do. So it’s a supplanting of patient sovereignty in that room and the doctor, doctor patient relationship. And that’s only a part. There’s a whole lot more than that. But bottom line then, looking at this juncture right now, electronic health collections, do you see that as a system being pushed by the government continuing to increase level off? Or how would you look at that? Where does that stand right now?
Twila Brase:
Well, I think that they have no intention to stop, but it’s a little interesting that Elon Musk is starting to talk about electronic health records. He’s actually encouraged people to send their imaging like their x-rays and MRIs to his AI chat box called Grok-2. And he’s part of those, right? Looking at expenses and how to curtail expenses. And if we could get to him, it’s entirely possible that something could be done to eliminate this burden on the exam room and on the cost of care because it’s a huge burden that takes doctors away from patients to do something the government wants them to be doing instead of patient care.
Sam Rohrer:
Alright, that’s great. We’ll just let that hang out there, ladies and gentlemen, for now, let’s move on to REAL ID. It’s a digitized collection. We’ve talked about it a lot. So I’m not going to go into detail here, ladies and gentlemen on this regard. But the real ID law, it’s something that happened years ago, it’s how Twila and I actually first met when I was in the Pennsylvania House. She came to testify at a committee there. But nonetheless, at this point in time, it was passed in the law. It was to go into effect. It’s been postponed a number of times, but it is now to go into effect on May 7th, 2025. That’s what, six months from now approximately. So here’s the question. Bring us up to date on REAL id, what’s happening, what might happen and what people need to do and be thinking about this mandate that’s coming.
Twila Brase:
Yeah. As a result of being on your program on September 18th, you notified me about the pending rule or proposed rule of progressive enforcement and progressive consequences on a real ID that was posted on September 12th. And so we took immediate action. There were only 63 comments, many of them for this proposed rule, and we just engaged everyone that we could. And by the end of the deadline, which was October 15th, there were 31,764 public comments and most of them against this proposed rule. Now, this proposed rule would say that on May 7th, rather than being immediately like you have to have it or have some real ID compatible identification in order to fly, it would say there would be progressive enforcement, progressive consequences and they encourage a three or they suggest a three strikes and you’re out at the airport like three times you can come. But on the fourth one, they’ll send you home tickets in hand, luggage in hand, children in hand.
And so we oppose this. Our public comment I think shows some history that we didn’t even know before we pulled it together, which is really important, like how the real ID office at Homeland Security, even though 30 some states back in the 2008 2009 wrote laws, past laws against real id, they just worked with the DMV and the state to move the entire state toward real ID without the consent of the governor or the legislators. I mean, it was amazing to learn this particular piece. And so right now where we’re at is waiting to see what will happen now for their final rule or will they not do it at all. And we will start working with the Trump administration trying to get them to not move forward with real id. And in the meantime, we’re just encouraging people not to take the real ID to get rid of the real ID that they have if they’re allowed to do it in their state, they’re 44% of all IDs and driver’s licenses are not real ID compliant and we want that to be 46 and 48 and 55. We need to move it the other direction. This is a national ID that will become part of a, will set us up in this country for a social credit system and they want to put it AMVA, which is all the administrators of the DMVs, AMVA wants on your phone remote and real time accessible so they could just shut it off. So we really need to stop this initiative in its tracks.
Sam Rohrer:
Absolutely. And ladies and gentlemen, that is something to pray about. We’ve talked about it before, but Twila, I’ll have to say from my perspective, this concept of progressive penalties take away from it the shock that people will have. That does concern me. And so we need to be aware of that. Comment on this. I noted just a week ago, Israel, you may have to complete it in the next segment has just issued travel requirements for all American and German citizen. I find it interesting that American and Germans to comply effective January 1st of this next year to what they are referring to as their advanced electronic travel authorization procedure. That’s their name for it. And they’re telling people, Americans particular to enroll in the US STE step plan. From what I’m reading, I’m concerned because I see a linkage between digitization of data travel, potentially real id, I don’t know. But anyways, comment and whatever you can’t finish, we’ll carry over the next segment.
Twila Brase:
So I think anything where the whole world is moving towards digital IDs, and it’s interesting that you’ve got to just wonder if there’s somebody in the US pushing Israel to say we need digitized IDs. And I think this also is this whole push at the airport to stand in front of that camera and get your biometric face registered and compared with your id. And so I encourage people not to do that. And apparently on Twitter, I haven’t looked at it yet, but there’s a woman who was just given grief by the TSA for refusing to do that. And by law and by their own regulations, you don’t have to, you can opt out of that. So in every way, shape or form, we should be stopping the digitization and the biometric creation of our identities to even move to travel, to buy to sell, right?
Sam Rohrer:
Absolutely. And with that, I’ll give you a chance to fill in any more in the next segment. Ladies and gentlemen, I brought that up because oftentimes, at least in America, good people, if they say, well, if Israel is in favor of it, then it’s got to be good. No way. Not true, not true at all. But this is something that may be a coerce for many Americans wanting to travel to the Middle East and Israel to do something they otherwise should not do. We’ll come back and then we’ll conclude with 2025 initiatives. Alright, Twila, you may have said everything you wanted to say on the last segment with real id and I brought up the requirement by Israel for people who are going to come into the country to be a part of their upgraded electronic system that they’re calling it. My recent trip to Israel, they absolutely, I did not say I would not, and I’m not quite sure what they would’ve done, but you stand right smack there in front of the camera and they take your picture. And we all know that is a digitized camera and it is digitizing the picture. And I’m going to say in this respect, stealing your identity without permission, which is really at the heart of what it is. But nonetheless, connect if you would here a little bit, the real id, the digitization of pictures, faces, biometric and health data with what we’ve been talking about actually came out of covid was travel passports. Just make it clear for people who may not understand how key data is linked and the harm that could come from that.
Twila Brase:
Well, thank you for asking about Linked Because I was looking up this ETA, this electronic, now I’m so electronic travel authorization. There we go. And found out that for Israel, and it is interesting that it’s America and Germany and they say it’s a pilot program and maybe that’s where the majority of their visitors come from. That may be why it’s those two countries, I’m not sure. But the information that you have to supply to Israel is your full name, sex, gender, place and date of birth, citizenship status, passport number, expiration date, contact details, emergency contact details, criminal record, employment status and occupation and health status. And describe how you plan to finance your state in Israel, including the means and sources of your funds. And so I looked up ETS elsewhere and in Canada it makes it very clear that all this data is linked to your passport.
So wherever you go with your passport, I don’t know if it’s linked outside of Israel, I’m guessing it’s only in Israel. But what you can see here is, I mean they say this is for visa exempt countries. Well, but it’s almost like doing a visa without doing a visa, right? Good for two years costs like $20. I think you can come and go as long as you have it, but it’s all being digitized. It’s connected to your passport, which has a biometric face facial recognition system in it. And so everything is really, it’s just the net, right? You can just feel the net closing when it comes to surveillance systems. And the United Nations wants this. There are world powers that want this. There are people in the United States that want this so that we’re all tracked wherever we are in the world and potentially controlled.
Sam Rohrer:
And ladies and gentlemen, can I just throw this into here as well, and Twila did not mention it, but I’m going to mention this point because this is also linked. Key is key word linking, linking of data to financial data. That is the other piece. Because once you shift away from the dollar to a digitized currency, which is going to happen, all of these sources of information will be put together into a card. And that’s the point of what China has been perfected frankly. And we talked about it going to the whole matter of social credit scoring and being able to turn off or turn on your ability to buy and sell. Now, does not that sound prophetical? The answer is absolutely yes. That will happen at some point being we cite these things is because these elements, this net, this part that’s gathering all the information that anybody would ever want to know about us is happening as we speak. And some you can do something about some you can’t, but of which we all I think need to be aware. I’ll just leave it at that. But Twila, let’s check the balance of this segment here. You have launched a number of initiatives. You mentioned one on the front side, the guide to Medicare. Talk about a couple of the most important initiatives that you have laid out there, that guide being one of them and one of them encouraging patients to start using cash with a doc. Those are two I know that we didn’t talk about.
Twila Brase:
So the Medicare how to guide, which can be found on the homepage of our website, it’s free. And one woman told us that she has shared it with her entire email list. So I would encourage others to do so because as somebody told me in DC who took a look at it, there’s nothing like it. There’s information there that they’re not going to find elsewhere unless they just go do the whole hunt like we did for about nine months. We have our helpful handout section on our website where you can find the discharge instructions to help you ask the right questions in the exam room and avoid the coercion. Our patient toolbox also helps with patient coercion and that patient toolbox.org, the wedge of health freedom@jointhe.com list. Doctors that are cash based, we know we don’t have even half the doctors and we’re looking for them.
So if you have some, direct them to there because it’s free for them and free for you. We have a privacy resource for parents that’s going to be coming out in the beginning of the year, so we can talk more about that in 2025. And we have our model state legislative library for state legislators to come and get health freedom legislation that they can just adapt to their own state. And we encourage you as listeners of this program to go out and tell your state legislators that here is a resource and they can call and talk to our legislative director and find out and even help we draft or change the language if they wish. So those are just some of the resources. And of course we will be in Washington DC hopefully a lot this year trying to make something happen in the next two years. I think we’ve got two years of the trifecta after that. It’s anybody’s guess because we don’t know what will happen when the Senate next comes up for election.
Sam Rohrer:
Alright, and that sounds good actually. That’s all really good. Okay, we’re at the end here pretty much. I’m just going to give you one final opportunity. Anything at all that we did not cover that you would like to leave with our listeners before we bring this program to a close?
Twila Brase:
I guess I’d like to encourage people to go to CCH freedom.org, CCH freedom.org, and right on the homepage you can sign up to get our once a month email. And then we also do alerts. And I think that there will be a number of alerts having to do with whatever is happening at the congressional level this year and next year. And the more people that we have engaged on it and we can activate you sooner rather than later, the better. And so if people would sign up so that they could get this information and be at the ready to act if we need it.
Sam Rohrer:
Alright, and I think that’s great and Twila, it’s been a privilege to have you on this program every month, all of this year, and we look forward to going into next year. Thank you that you’ve stayed true to your mission and we can with confidence, encourage our listeners to go to your site, CCH freedom.org and take advantage of what you have. Ladies and gentlemen, I want to thank you for being with us today. Tomorrow, Dr. Jamie Mitchell will be here with a special guest. I’ll be here with Dr. Bill Salus on Wednesday, as I mentioned. Talk about Siri, talk about prophetical things as it relates to Siri and what’s happening there. That’ll be our focus on Wednesday. David New will be with me on Thursday, and we’ll be looking at a number of constitutional issues that are before us on Thursday. And then that’ll take us right into Friday, the balance of the week, and then next week, obviously Christmas, where you’ll be hearing best of programs, best of programs carefully selected from the year. We’ll be playing that week of Christmas and New Year’s as well actually done almost since we’ve started the program. So that’s a little bit, I’ll talk more about those things in the days ahead. Again, thanks for being with us today. God bless you all as we say, embrace the truth, pursue it, and then stand in the gap.
Recent Comments