Vaccines – Some Good? All Bad?
What You Need to Know
April 16, 2025
Host: Hon. Sam Rohrer
Guest: Dr. Sherry Tenpenny
Note: This transcript is taken from a Stand in the Gap Today program aired on 4/16/25. To listen to the podcast, click HERE.
Disclaimer: While reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate transcription, the following is a representation of a mechanical transcription and as such, may not be a word for word transcript. Please listen to the audio version for any questions concerning the following dialogue.
Sam Rohrer:
Hello and welcome to this Wednesday edition of Stand In the Gap Today, and it’s another medicine and health focused program. You’re going to want to not miss this. Stay tuned with the confirmation of Robert F. Kennedy as Secretary of Health and Human Services, which I’ve talked about in his program before. The overwhelming official exposure of the, I’m going to say some things here. My words are chosen carefully. The overwhelming official exposure of intentional fraud and corruption within the departments of H-H-S-F-D-A and CDC among others. The potential trajectory of federal health policy does have the potential of putting parents truth and honesty and objectivity back in the saddle at least a little bit. When it comes to health. The potential is there, certainly not solely because of the covid assault on the health of Americans and people worldwide, but the fact is now irrefutable that government health focused officials and people in that position, they are and they have been operating in their own best interest and those corrupted special interest around them and not in the best interest of the American people.
Some of the casualties have been, as we know, the near fatal attack on, for instance, truth-based medical research and testing and through bribery and fraud and corruption, the wholesale conversion, as we’ve talked about many times here on our healthcare institutions, into moneymaking special interests, not patient health and the criminalization of honorable physicians and healthcare professionals committed to upholding their Hippocratic oath and the fear of God, such as my returning cast today. Now of course, the silencing of thousands, including us right here at Stand In the Gap today, who even questioned the government narrative during the height of the covid years and the attempt still ongoing by the way, to destroy the doctor patient relationship with artificial intelligent, government driven government healthcare rationing. And thankfully, many people are now though to all these things, many people at least are much more alert to the many lies and the deception that we’ve heard for a long time.
And actually even because of the efforts of DOGE gone beyond in proving the extent of fraud and frankly, in my opinion, many cases of treason itself. But with this backdrop of reality in place, I’m planning on initiating a recurring monthly emphasis on selected and critical aspects of health that are real and present, but also most of them are filled with controversy. So today I’ve asked a highly qualified physician to join me again for a conversation that all caring parents must work through and even as adults confront for themselves. And that is the issue of vaccines with the reports of measles in an area of Texas there, the vaccine lobby is working very hard to seize the opportunity to justify all vaccines as safe and to demonize any parent or physician who raises any question about their safety and necessity. There really is a battle of narratives and for truth underway as we speak on this issue as the vaccine lobby is spending millions of dollars to ridicule all arguments against any opposition or even questioning of the pharmaceutical industry’s vaccine marketing narrative.
And you will note as you’re watching to demonize as stupid and uncaring parents who have carefully chosen not to give or even delay the administering of vaccines to their babies and children. Now, my guest today is Dr. Sherry Tenpenny. She’s an authority on vaccines from all aspects. She’s an osteopathic medical doctor by training board certified in osteopathic medicine with a proficiency in certification of integrative medicine. She’s also the founder of Tenpenny Integrative Medical Center, a clinic located near Cleveland, Ohio. My home state, by the way, not that makes any difference, but that’s where I grew up and where her clinic provides natural holistic approaches to getting well. The title I’ve chosen to frame today’s program and our conversation is This Vaccines Some Good, all bad, what do you need to know with that? Dr. Sherry Tenpenny, thanks for being back with me today.
Sherry Tenpenny:
Well, thank you so much, Sam. Thanks for having me on
Sam Rohrer:
Sherry in the area of vaccines, what they are, what they are not to independent physicians and health professionals around this country, you and your efforts have become a true friend to the co-opted vaccine proponents. You have been identified as an enemy and a lead proponent of misinformation and that’s why I’m glad to have you on the program today because people are known both by their friends and their enemies, and you’ve defined yourself well, and that’s why I want you here. But that being the case, let’s define some terms. Please define the word vaccine and when it first became a term of medical note, the word is out there, but a lot of people don’t even know what it is.
Sherry Tenpenny:
Well, it’s interesting that that word, it’s a great place to start because definitely I say that lots of athings, words have power and definitions are important. So what the word vaccine comes from the word baca, which means cow. And it was first used in first coined by Edward General Regener Jenner when he developed a smallpox vaccine back in the late 17 hundreds. People don’t maybe know that that first came into be in 1798. And so it’s been around for a long time. And then as we went into the 18 hundreds, the word vaccine just became kind of synonymous with what they were doing with the smallpox vaccine, which is that’s a whole discussion and a whole several hour discussion in itself because a lot of times when people begin questioning vaccines, they always start, well, what about smallpox and what about polio? And I’ve actually done a four hour presentation just on that topic. So the idea that vaccines have been around for a long time, they’ve always been questioned. In fact, the first mandatory vaccination laws were in 1865, I’m sorry, 1863, and that was the same year that the anti-vaccine, first anti-vaccine movement got together and collaborated and it was called Our Babies Battle. And so the anti-vaccine movement being on the rise at the same time that mandatory vaccination was for smallpox vaccines was coming into play in 1863. So all the things that we see fighting against vaccines and all the controversy about vaccination has been around since its inception.
Sam Rohrer:
Okay? And that’s an excellent foundation for where we are. And ladies and gentlemen, stay with us because I’m going to give you just a little bit more definition built off of what Dr. Sherry Tenpenny, my guest today on our theme vaccines, some good, all bad, but what you need to know because if you’re listening to me, whether you’re a grandparent or a parent, whether you have children or just grandchildren or however that may be, we’ve all been and being continually told that vaccines are all good, all necessary, but there’s quite a backlash to that. Matter of fact, a family from Massachusetts had their five children taken because they refused to give a shot to their infant baby. Well, we’re going to talk about that a little bit too. So stay with us because this is a matter of significance to all no matter where you are.
We’ll be back in just a moment if you’re just joining us. Glad to have you on board. We’re engaging a controversial theme, but it’s all over the news. No matter who you are, you’ve had to deal with this. And the question is, I have found from people, whether I was in the legislature dealing with people or just as a parent or now as a host of this program, is the fact that people say, what do I think and what it’s about, the issue of vaccines. So the title today is Vaccines Some Good, all Bad, what You Need to Know. And my special guest, her Focus not among other things, is a leading expert on the matter of vaccines. And that’s Dr. Sherry 10. Penny been with me before a couple years ago, but this issue of vaccines is back in the news. And so we’re going to talk about it not being the case.
Let me go back here to a little bit of history. While the concept of vaccines according to most medical sources is first attributed, and I’m going to add on to what Dr. Tenpenny said in the last segment, most attribute to the efforts going all the way back to 1100 ad, but in a form that they call variolation, where according to history, dried scab material from smallpox victims was allegedly used in an attempt to inoculate children and adults to smallpox with variations of this attempt way back there in Turkey, Africa, China, and Europe. Now that’s what history says. The variation technique is reported to have been introduced in Great Britain in 1721. Though I find interesting, according to the official Webster’s dictionary of 1828, variation wasn’t even recognized as a word. Now that’s interesting. However, the word vaccine was present in 1828. Variation was not, but with a very simple and enlightening definition, and Dr.
Tenpenny shared it. Here’s a little bit more on it. Vaccine. It’s from the Latin vais from vaca, a cow. It is an adjective. Here’s the definition pertaining to cows originating with or derived from cows. And here’s an example of the word usage as the vaccine disease. That’s how it’s used. Vaccine disease as an adjective or cowpox. So in other words, the word vaccine as we use it today never started out as a noun. There was no such thing as a vaccine. It was an adjective, meaning a disease and referring to cowpox. In other words, a vaccine describes a disease, not something by definition to prevent disease. Now those are my words, Sherry, from my legislative background definitions as they are to you in medicine. They were important to me because it’s what you build a law or policy around and it’s how the courts actually will interpret what it means. And I found that this original definition of vaccine was rather interesting. I didn’t know that per se, but here’s the question. Vaccine has become a noun now used to be really an adjective. Can you share from your perspective now a little bit more of the pertinent history of vaccines from inception to our current time? And then I’m going to want to have you take and bring it up to where we are here today.
Sherry Tenpenny:
Well come on Vax Sam. That’s a 200 year topic. We started with cowpox and smallpox and there’s so much history around the whole conundrum of even the effectiveness or lack thereof of the smallpox vaccine. Dr. Suzanne Humphreys has a two volume book that she’s just released, an updated version of her book called Dissolving Illusions. It’s a two volume set and each book is over 700 pages. So I just throw that out there to how much history is involved with just the smallpox vaccine alone. And then from there in the early 19 hundreds, they developed a tetanus vaccine for World War I. And then there was a typhus vaccine that some people think was really the cause of what they call the Great Influenza Pandemic was because their immune systems were all weakened by these filthy dirty vaccines they were given before they went to the war theater.
Then there was the pertussis vaccine that came in the twenties and not much happened historically, I would say between in the fifties and the sixties. It wasn’t until 1986 when the vaccine industry and the pharmaceutical industry were getting their pants sued off of them on a regular basis because of the brain injury being caused by the whole cell pertussis vaccine. And in 1986, Reagan signed into law the National Vaccine injury, the National Vaccine Childhood Injury Compensation Act, and that was in 1986. The problem with that act was like a lot of laws and you’ve been in the legislature, so there’s good and bad in it. The good part was that they established the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System and also the vaccine court, which both of those have their own problems, but we’re the only really country that tracks and has a place to monitor that.
The downside of it is that the pharmaceutical industry was given complete liability and liability protection for any injury caused by a vaccine that was as long as it was on the childhood vaccination schedule. So in 1991, the floodgates were open, and since that time, they have developed now 17 more. Well, they’ve developed 15 more vaccines that started in 1991 with the Hepatitis B vaccine that’s now given at birth. The Hemophilus Influenza B vaccine that’s given at 2, 4, 6 months and a year. And then it just continued from there. We got chickenpox, vitamin A, Prevnar for strep pneumonia for Gardasil, for a whole laundry list of other vaccines that were created. And so we’ve become a vaccination nation and when people really dig into my whole thing of what I’ve been wanting to do since I’ve been doing this for 25 years, Sam, that I’ve dug into, I’ve written books, I’ve written lots of articles, I’ve contributed chapters to books, I’ve spoken on stages all over the world about problems associated with vaccines, and my effort has always been to get people to just ask what’s coming through that needle and do I need to get so many vaccines on the same day?
I mean, if you really think that these vaccines do something for you and keep you from getting sick, which there’s never been any proof that they do. So with that, just to ask what’s coming through the needle? Because if you get all of the vaccines, you’re going to get somewhere around 74 doses by the time you graduate from high school and more than a hundred doses of
Sam Rohrer:
Chemicals. Alright? Now most listening would know a piece of that. Let me just ask you this question here right now, and that is, what is the underlying assumption about vaccinate? In other words, what is it supposedly to do that makes Well, I mean everybody’s bought into it. I’m a parent. I’ve had six children. We definitely limited what they got and we were very careful as best as we could, but everybody has to struggle with that. But the idea is that if I don’t give them a vaccination, I am harming them because they will get sick and likely die if they don’t take the vaccination. What ultimately is the premise behind the vaccine,
Sherry Tenpenny:
That’s the premise. They want you to believe that all of these illnesses that your child is vulnerable, they’re just hanging around a corner waiting to pounce on them, and if they become sick, they’re going to die. And so you must vaccinate because if we take a little piece of that virus or a little portion of that bacteria and inject it into your body, your body will create a neutralizing antibody and will float around ostensibly forever so that if you ever come in contact with those and contract those infections, the preformed antibody will glob onto that virus or onto that bacteria and neutralize it and therefore you won’t get sick. It’s a great premise and everything I just said is not true.
Sam Rohrer:
Okay? It’s not true. Alright, RFK, Robert F. Kennedy, new Secretary of Health Human Services, he’s raised questions. He’s suggested that too many vaccines or the vaccines himself whatever, are a leading cause of autism. He’s in the midst of now trying to do studies across the country to answer the question, by September of do vaccines contribute to the dramatic rise of autism. What do you think may be the trajectory of vaccine policy federally as a result of perhaps what RFP is doing?
Sherry Tenpenny:
Well, yesterday’s release from the US Center for Disease Control from the CDC released its 2025 report on autism and developmental disability monitoring. And we have now found that one in 31 8 year olds have autism around the autism spectrum, the highest recorded rate ever, and then it gets worse nationwide. The number of boys that have autism are one in 20 and the number of boys in California, it’s one in 12.5
Sam Rohrer:
That’s staggering. Just out of curiosity, how do those numbers compare to other nations of the world?
Sherry Tenpenny:
I don’t know the answer to that, but I know that we are the only nation in the only country in the world that hammers these kids mercilessly. Children get 20 vaccines by the time they are six months of age, they get about 30 by the time they’re one year of age and they get close to 40 by the time they start kindergarten. Those are all, in my opinion, they’re all doses of poison because we are injecting toxic chemicals that don’t belong in the body ostensibly to make them healthy. There was a quote from 1937. There was a physician who said his name was Dr. Hayes in 1937. He said, how can we expect injecting foreign matter into children in any way improves their health was as true then as it is today?
Sam Rohrer:
That’s a logical question and ladies and gentlemen, we’ll try to go a little further. It’s not possible to deal with this subject with comprehensively in every regard in an hour. We know that we’re trying to deal with, and I’m trying to put together the high points to give some ability to help all of you and all of us think through what we already think we think. Or perhaps you’re in a point where you’re needing to come to a point of what do I think we’re trying to answer that further when we come back? Well, with the outbreak of measles in Texas, of which we are all fully aware, I referenced that in the first segment. And if you’re listening to any other type of news in addition to us, you’ve heard about that. But with that outbreak, big pharma and big government together, big pharma and big government vaccine lobby, I’m going to put them in that category because they have gone full bore.
It seems to seize this opportunity. And here’s the keys. I’m looking at it not to strengthen the parents’, God-given moral and constitutional right to decide whether or not foreign matter and toxic chemicals are injected into their babies and their children’s bodies. No, not that you’ve noted it. It is to demonize these parents and all parents as literally enemies of their children and as threats to the health of the community and those around them. And while we don’t have time to get into the expose, a lot of folks are doing it and it’s where they, I’ll probably talk about later another program. What has happened in Massachusetts with this family of five children who are all in good health. They homeschool their kids, they appear by their appearances to be good. And by all evidences, they are all healthy. Have to say they’re going to claim those children, take those children from the parents because of neglect.
What’s the neglect? Well by the pediatrician who checked on the health of the child who turned them in because of neglect, because they chose not to give shots to their nine month old baby. Alright? So this is a real issue. The attempt is to demonize parents as literally enemies of their children and as threats in the case of Texas to the health of the community and those around them. But this battle focused on vaccines, what it appears to be, in my opinion, it’s not about vaccines but authority. And it comes down to the authority of the tyrannical elite, that elite run state versus the parents’ authority, which is frankly reflective of liberty in a free state of parents are not in control and make those determinations then government is. And it’s not about health, this debate or what’s best. It’s about money and control and what’s best for a few who literally think that their God, that is what humanism is by design by definition.
That’s what we’re seeing now. Sherry, let me ask you this now, a few common questions. Here’s the first one. It’s the concept of vaccines in fact, valid. The very concept got into that a little bit in the last segment, but it’s the concept of vaccines in fact valid and especially the commonly promoted vaccine cocktail for infants where to get them according before their first birthday. It’s a part of the federal childhood immunization schedule now, and frankly, as we as parents know, the child’s immune systems aren’t even developed at that point. So is the approach even valid?
Sherry Tenpenny:
No. No,
Sam Rohrer:
It’s
Sherry Tenpenny:
Not.
Sam Rohrer:
Go ahead. Why?
Sherry Tenpenny:
Because systematic poisoning of children is never a valid excuse to try to keep them from having a fever, a cough, a rash, vomiting, or diarrhea. I mean, kids are going to get sick occasionally, and it’s important for parents to understand when the illness is just a runny nose, it’s just a cough. It’s just something that they have to get used to. And it’s like taking their immune system to the gym and working it out when they are figuring out ways to deal with viruses and bacteria that they will be surrounded with by the rest of their life. What makes these few viruses and bacteria such a target against all of the millions, literally millions of other viruses and bacteria that are out there, they’ve made them to be the boogeyman that, oh my gosh, if you get measles, you’re going to die. Well, let me give you a couple of facts about measles.
The measles vaccine was released in 1963, the year before the measles vaccine was released. The death rate from measles was two in a million. So it was negligible. I mean, how many people die each weekend in car crashes to put that into perspective? And it was one in 10,000. So one child out of 10,000 children contracted measles, one might die. And it’s usually from an underlying health condition, not they’re dying with measles, not from measles. Kind of like what we had the big discussion about covid about that. And then the vaccine came out in 1963. And so everybody’s all up in arms about these four children or these two children that died in Texas that we know for a fact that one of them did not die from measles but died from a different type of pneumonia. And the second child, to my knowledge, the medical records have not been publicly released yet since the year 2000. In the last 25 years, there have been five deaths from measles in the entire United States. There are 4 million live births per year. So 25 times four, that’s a hundred million children, right? Did I do my math right? 4 million kids times 25 years, a hundred million kids and five deaths. Why are we hysterical about this?
Sam Rohrer:
Alright, so fear is there now, theoretically, theoretically, this concept, because again, I’m a parent, I’m a grandparent now and in everyone I know working through this, the concept of taking a dead virus, the old polio as an example, and put some dead virus into a person, was that concept itself even a true thing? Does that work as compared to putting live virus into a body which most know that many actually get the disease as a result of the vaccine, speak to that particular issue?
Sherry Tenpenny:
Well, the thing is, is that if you really understand more about the immune system, when you get sick, let’s say you get the flu, a flu virus passes your nasal passages, gets into your blood and starts to replicate, and you get fever, cough, deep chills and all those sorts of things. When you understand the process of the immune system, white blood cells get activated, cytokines get activated, all kinds of things activate, neutralize that virus and to get it out of the body. The last thing to the show, the last element to show up is an antibody. It’s the cleanup crew. It’s the last thing that it does. So it’s there as a cleanup crew, but yet we want to inject viruses into children to develop an antibody which isn’t even needed. And so this whole concept of neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies, they come up with stories about that and injecting foreign matter into children, whether it’s a virus, part of a bacteria, whether it’s chemicals, is just a horrifying thing to do and somehow think that’s going to help make them healthy.
Sam Rohrer:
So at the heart of it is the concern that most caring parents have if they do any study, is that the concept that a dead or a live virus may keep my child from picking up a disease and dying. That’s the fear, is always has to be offset by the unknown impacts from chemicals, which are clearly a part of every vaccine from aluminum to Marisol, who knows what may be stuck into them and other toxins which are by themselves, they’re toxins, the hope that maybe they’re not as bad as what the good is. That’s what every parent has to labor through. And what you were saying is that how can anyone think for a moment that any toxin or any foreign matter injected into particularly a baby who doesn’t even have their immune system developed, how can anyone come to a conclusion that can be a good thing? That’s basically what you’re saying.
Sherry Tenpenny:
Yes.
Sam Rohrer:
Okay. And so therefore, if a child naturally gets a disease, measles or whatever, you said at one point before the vaccine came up, one in like 2 million, whatever number it was actually died from it and they died with it. Generally not because of it. If a child actually gets a disease, they do build an antibody. Does that resistance or that protection against that disease speak to the value of that kind of an immunity compared to a foreign matter vaccine that you hope produces a vaccine immunity?
Sherry Tenpenny:
We put way too much emphasis on antibodies, Sam, that’s the problem with the entire industry. All they want to do is inject something to create an antibody, but we don’t understand that if the antibody doesn’t have anything to neutralize, it goes away or it will attack your own organ systems. If it has an amino acid sequence that looks similar to the virus or bacteria that it would normally neutralize, that antibody will attack your liver, your lungs, your joints, your pancreas. And that is by definition, an autoimmune disease. When you’ve had a natural infection, your body doesn’t just maintain antibodies around the body, conserves energy, and it’s not necessary to have them around and being hypervigilant on the outside chance that you might run into a measles virus or a diptheria bacteria or something like that, that is rarely around. There’s an entire dance that happens between your innate immune system and your adaptive immune system. When you actually have a real infection, the antibodies go away. They get stimulated. If you have an exposure and instead of a synthetically made antibody from this vaccine that is constantly there in high abundance, that may lead to an autoimmune disease.
Sam Rohrer:
And that takes us right up to the break. Ladies and gentlemen, stay with us. I hope that you are benefiting by this discussion. We’re trying to put a lot in and a short bit, and I’m trying to ask key questions and Dr. Sherry Tenpenny, who’s with me, is doing a great job of responding to them. There’s a question that all parents have, or at least we should have, is that as a part of covid, this concept of mRNA as a gene therapy was thrown upon us and is now incorporated into by FDA approval, I think all vaccines including childhood vaccines. Now what about that? When we come back, I’m going to ask her that question and then we’ll end up with some concluding thoughts. Well, as we go into our final segment, I just want to put a couple of contact points here for Dr.
Sherry Tenpenny before you, if you would like more information about her clinic, which may be of great advantage depending upon where you might be or of material. All of that. Here are a couple different things here, dr tenpenny.com. That’s for general information. Easy to remember, dr tenpenny.com. And for books, supplements, and that kind of a thing which you may be very interested in is shop tenpenny.net. Shop 10 penny.net. Now, I’ll try to give that one more time before we close out the program today. But before I go into asking you Dr. Tenpenny about the MRNA component piece, I just want to get this piece in here because while there are many government issued laws and policies regarding our health focused conversation today concerning this theme of vaccines, the very subject by nature is complicated. I recognize that because we’ve touched on a number of things.
There are elements of science. There’s research, there’s observation, there’s law, there’s parental authority, there’s all of these kinds of things involved. And certainly increasing human knowledge in research we know has changed over time about such basic things as germs and viruses and the understanding of the workings of the human body and health and nutrition, let alone, I’m going to say the coordinated impact of the covid assault on general human health and patient freedom. All of those things have all added, in my opinion, to the confusion and the concern that people have about what’s happening today and this theme. Yet there is one aspect of all of this that I believe anyways is not complicated. And to me, that’s the real target of what’s under attack, and that is truth, the truth of God’s design for the human body, the truth that God has designed our body to function the way God has designed with remarkable immune system and all of that, the truth that God’s system of individual authority and the grant of free will to each individual and God-given fundamental right of parental authority in regard to raising of our children and deciding what goes into their body and into their ears.
That’s parental responsibility. All of those things are there. That part to me is ladies and gentlemen, not so complicated, but I think that’s what’s really under attack. We’ll deal more of that later. But Sherry, if you could, let’s come back and I want to ask you that question. I brought it up because during the Covid days, this concept of MRNA messenger, RNA component piece was inserted into covid. It became a major issue, but now it has moved from that to the point that it has been approved for addition. And you can bring us up to date into even all of the infant vaccines. What is the difference between that mRNA we now know to be a gene therapy and the concept of vaccine? And then to pull that together, and then I’ll ask you a concluding comment of what do parents do in light of all these things?
Sherry Tenpenny:
Well, the mRNA is a technology. It’s a technology platform of a way that they can replicate and generate vaccines for ostensibly to treat you for pandemics and things like that, and a much faster and a much more rapid rate than the way that they generally make vaccines in through eggs if it’s an egg-based vaccine or through cultivating viruses in large vats of animal cells and things like that. So the mRNA technology was brought to the forefront because of speed of development. Now, there are talks about putting mRNA in all of the childhood pediatric vaccines, but they haven’t been developed yet. It’s just a talk about it. The most recent one that is pretty near to being released is the brand new RSV vaccine that’s now given to newborns when they’re born. It was that vaccine was developed to prevent kids from getting RSV, which is respiratory virus, the only kids that are at big risk for it are the preemies and the ultra preemies.
But the pharmaceutical industry said, Hey, let’s just give it to all of them. And that became a 1.1 billion blockbuster vaccine overnight. And because almost all children have RSV, because what RSV is, it’s like a cold and almost all kids have an RSV infection by the time they’re two years of age, and then they don’t get it again the rest of their life. They have natural immunity. So this was another fabricated thing by the vaccine industry and the pharmaceutical industry to assault children’s immune systems that make them customers for life by making them chronically ill from a very early Ray age. Now, the mRNA technology, it’s kind of a long explanation, but it’s very different than just injecting the attenuated vaccines and the parts of bacterial vaccines that we’ve had forever. They’re two completely different things. It’s really an apples to oranges comparison.
Sam Rohrer:
Okay. So in reality, we know, and we’ve stated here, and it’s been recognized that a gene therapy is not a vaccine. So the calling of the C shot as a vaccine was never true from the beginning because it never was and never met the definition of vaccine. But it became accepted and promoted as if it was a vaccine in all of that, correct?
Sherry Tenpenny:
Yeah. They co-opted the word vaccine because vaccination is a 200 year multi-generational thing that is indoctrinated into the psyche of parents and grandparents and et cetera. And so we think we know as a general population what a vaccine is, and we have been led to believe that vaccines are safe and effective and protect you and are necessary. And so all of the language that goes around vaccines was co-opted by Pfizer and Moderna and j and j and AstraZeneca and called it a vaccine because that improved people’s ability to accept it as an injection. And then what we found out is by the process of what the messenger RNA did, what it was programmed to do was to replicate over and over and over again the spike protein that then went into the DNA that can go into the DNA can go into your brain. It has a long list of things it can do, and it’s that insertion of that additional piece of protein into your DNA that is, that’s what actually makes it be called a genetic therapy, a gene therapy. I’ve never liked the word therapy because somehow therapy sounds like a good thing. It’s a treatment. It’s more like genetic manipulation that is irreversible once you’ve had a covid shot,
Sam Rohrer:
And we’ve talked about that with my own family physician on this program, that 70% of his cases and frontline doctors are finding are the result of that exact thing taking place in people’s bodies who got the shot and they’re sick, sick, sick. And that’s a sad thing that is just horrendous that that ever took place, but it was alive from the beginning. Okay. We’re just about done. You only have 30 seconds. In a general sense, how should parents respond to all this in their children? Can they get information somewhere? I mean, what would you say to them in 30 seconds?
Sherry Tenpenny:
I would say get my new book. Get my new book. It’s called Zero Accountability in a Broken System, how The Pharmaceutical Industry That Weaponizes Vaccines, public Health and the Law. It’s a 400 page book. It’s available on Amazon. It’s called Zero Accountability because it fills in all the background about bird flu, influenza, about adjuvants, about what’s happened in our public health system and why you really need to think long and hard before you ever get another vaccine.
Sam Rohrer:
Okay. The title again? Zero Accountability.
Sherry Tenpenny:
Zero Accountability in a Broken System, just Zero Accountability. We’ll get you there on Amazon.
Sam Rohrer:
Okay. Excellent. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny. Thank you so much for being with me again today. Again, for information, I’ll just give it for products or other things from her shop, tenpenny.net or drtenpenny.com. I encourage you to go there for more information. Thank you for being with us today. Join me tomorrow. We’re going to talk about the matter of euthanasia. You know what that is? You can’t believe what’s happening in Canada a lot. We’ll talk about that tomorrow.
Recent Comments