The To Be Determined Question:
Does A Restructured Federal Government = Restored Health Freedom?
Feb. 19, 2025
Host: Hon. Sam Rohrer
Guest: Twila Brase
Note: This transcript is taken from a Stand in the Gap Today program aired on 2/19/25. To listen to the podcast, click HERE.
Disclaimer: While reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate transcription, the following is a representation of a mechanical transcription and as such, may not be a word for word transcript. Please listen to the audio version for any questions concerning the following dialogue.
Sam Rohrer:
Hello and welcome to this Wednesday edition. Now already midweek here, the end in the gap today. It’s also our monthly health freedom update with Twila Brase, president and co-founder of Citizens Council for Health Freedom. And they have a website exhibit to you right up front, cc freedom.org. And I’ll restate that through the program. Now today, since January 20 inauguration day, the entire world has literally stared in amazement. Is it not? Are we not all how fast and well methodical? The shock and awe changes coming from Trump. 47 is actually occurring so fast, volume and frequency, clearly having learned many things from his first term. Donald Trump came into this term and with a team with a resolve and a vision of what can be as he interprets greatness and executes what under any description would be. As we’ve described her at an earlier program, a blitzkrieg, by implementing comprehensive changes through close to 70 executive orders to date, give or take a little, the lightning speed auditing of multiple federal departments by Doge and global initiatives with demands to bring peace in, whether it be Ukraine or in the Middle East, to a statement yesterday that he’s dismantling the bricks nations and their goals to achieving a bloodless victory over China or the United Nations, or let alone the forced restructuring of NATO now underway and resultant reordering of the totality of Europe as they’re all wondering what to do.
The plans are sweeping and they’re simultaneous. It’s moving fast. But as of this time, the outcome is unknown, ranging from a response of World War people saying, I don’t like what you’re saying, to an unequal space of economic prosperity. So these are the days in which we live exhilarating on one hand, but beyond perilous and uncertain on the other. Interesting, isn’t it? Now, for the purpose of today’s focus, however, on health freedom, there have been many changes made thus far, and they will have far ranging impacts on health and healthcare and the primary focus of our recurring program here now today, health freedom. But one thing is certain change, one thing is not certain the outcome. So the title I’ve chosen for today is this, the to be determined to question, does a restructured federal government equal restored health freedom? And with that, I welcome Twila, thanks for being back with me. You’ve been extraordinarily busy in this area in Washington. I want to have you give us some updates, but good to have you back.
Twila Brase:
Oh, it’s great to be here. Thanks, Sam.
Sam Rohrer:
Twilight, you were with me on January 8th that I just want to recall all of you are listening. That theme was 2025 Health Freedom in America from Diagnosis to Prognosis. And there was a goal of that program, which was to establish a benchmark analysis of where health freedom was in this nation at the end of 2024 and before the start of the Trump administration Twila. In that program, I ask you to diagnose the integrity of our healthcare system generally and the doctor-patient relationship, which is so important to it overall. And I ask you to give it a ranking of comatose, one on scale, one to 10, 10 being in perfect health. You came back then saying it was between a three and a four, meaning that the system is quite sick, but you held out hope for changes from the Trump inauguration forward, and we talked about a lot of things that day as you looked forward.
So today on the program, I want to cover a few of those things that were mentioned here, your overall thoughts of what’s happened thus far. In the next segment, I want to ask you about artificial intelligence proposal and what that may mean in health freedom. And then I want to close by talking about Real id, which has an implementation date coming up and has an effect as well. So here’s my first question to you. Go wherever you want to. Now that RFK has been approved as Secretary of Health and Human Services, threats by members of Congress of the prosecution of Tony Fauci because of his lies is, well a whole lot more from the standpoint of personnel appointments like RFK. How might the administration of healthcare in this nation and health freedom be impacted? In other words, share your hopes and your concerns.
Twila Brase:
Okay, well, I think there’s a lot that we’re all waiting breathlessly to see what’s going to happen. But regarding the appointments, so RFK, I think RFK has a lot of concern for the American people. I think he doesn’t like it when people get damaged by things that are funded by the government, like the shots and food additives and all the subsidies that go into adding additives to our foods. But I’m not sure what he actually knows or any plans that he might have with Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare, which are the hugest parts of the agency that he will be heading. He’ll be head of the HHS, but under him will be other people. And for those who don’t understand how big HHS is, HHS is 17 huge offices in it and it’s got 13 huge operating divisions like C-M-S-C-D-C-N-I-H, the FDA, those are just four of the 17. So I think there’s something like 80,000 people in HHS. And so we sort of wonder what’s going to happen here. But at CMS it’ll be Dr. Oz. And we’re very concerned with Dr. Oz because he wants Medicare Advantage for all, which is health plans for all run by the government. So it’s a nationalized healthcare system. We don’t support that. We’re not sure why he got this position, whether CMS, I think that NIHJ
Sam Rohrer:
Was, explain that. What is CMS for those who may not know?
Twila Brase:
Oh, sorry. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. So it runs everything having to do with Medicare and that’s not just the program, it’s things like the research entity, the Office of Inspector General within HHS and all of the Medicaid programs, all of the kid care programs, all of Obamacare, all of the health insurance exchanges, all of that is run out of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services. So huge and it, it’s one of their hugest budget items in the entire US budget. So like I said, I don’t even know what RFK, if he’s got plans, how much he knows about it. His conversations with the legislators in the US Finance Committee showed that he doesn’t know as much about it. So I guess we’ll see. And that’s where we hope as an organization to be able to speak into his thinking if we can get appointments with him and with Dr. Oz. But I’m very concerned with Dr. Oz, but NIH, which is all the research that’s done, here’s going to be run by Jay Bhattacharya. And Jay Bhattacharya was ousted from his positions because he took a position on vaccines that did not fit the narrative and he only wanted those shots to be given to the vulnerable. So he will change NIH significantly.
Sam Rohrer:
Alright, and with that Twila, you could give a whole lot more and maybe throughout the balance of the program you could throw in some additional things. But ladies and gentlemen, bottom line is big changes. As I’ve said, the outcome is not certain, and that’s for something about which we need to pray. Absolutely. And also to be encouraging folks like Twila who’s in that space focused on trying to influence people to think right and to do right. We’ll be back in just a moment. Well, if you’re just joining us today, welcome aboard and thanks for being with us. Our theme today here on Stand in the Gap today is this, the TBD to be determined question, does a restructured federal government equal restored health freedom? My special guest is Twila Brase. She’s with me every month, a favorite guest on the program as I hear from so many of you.
And so this focus today is on this theme, a restructured federal government. Certainly it’s underway, we can see it, but what does that mean for health freedom? Do we know? Well, that’s kind of our question here today, talking about what do we know, what can we project? Now, while the appointment of Robert F. Kennedy, for example, as Secretary of HHS, health Newman services will likely yield many good impacts, as Twila said in the last segment for regaining health freedom In some areas, the likely confirmation of Dr. Oz, as she mentioned the last segment we’ve talked about before, will predictively lead to serious threats to any improvement in the integrity of our healthcare system in the doctor patient relationship and health freedom overall because of where he is and what he thinks. So policy improvements to health freedom at the moment are, as I’ve said, unknown, they are unknown.
Another area where I’d like to get your response Twila is to the president’s very emphatic and highly prioritized, supportive, big tech and massive artificial intelligent driven data collections and analysis centers across the country. Now that was highly emphasized, both in Word and in timing says it was the big event the day after inauguration. So it was highly prioritized and that’s why I mentioned it because there’s a lot writing on that. But the purpose has stated, I’m just going to say ladies and gentlemen, in case you did not catch that, and probably most did not, but the purpose has stated in the president’s meeting in the White House on Tuesday, January 21st, there were three big tech billionaires there. Open AI, CEO, Sam Altman, SoftBank, CEO, Maya, Oshi son, and Oracle, CEO, Larry Elison. Now together those three and the president promised a new public private surveillance entity called Stargate.
And in this meeting before and after, they insisted that this new big tech consortium would guarantee among other things, and I’m going to quote, fast acting Cure of cancer. That was one. And then according to Sam Altman, Stargate would, and I’m going to quote and these are his words, help cure diseases of all types, including heart disease and cancer, deliver high quality healthcare, consolidate and analyze health records, allow doctors to understand the condition of their patients and be able to provide healthcare plan better than they otherwise would be. Those were his words. Now, in addition, AI would be able to test patient’s, DNA, they made that clear. Oracle CEO talked about this test A patient’s DNA and predict if they would get cancer and then within 48 hours develop a tailor-made mRNA vaccine to prevent the cancer made just for them. Another benefit of course would be that using AI would reduce costs and ensure unbiased quality of diagnosis and treatment. And then I add this for my own thoughts, who could be opposed to this? Alright, so with that, because it all sounds so good. All right, now Twila, those are my thoughts. I laid some out there, but to you, what could be the benefits to health freedom overall, healthcare system, integrity, improvement, doctor patient relationship improvement? And on the other side, what could be concerns of this? Because clearly this is going to be a part of healthcare delivery and oversight in this administration for the reasons that I just stated.
Twila Brase:
Okay. Well first I just want to be clear because a lot of people are saying that big tech’s going to give 50 billion to this initiative, but in the articles that I’ve read, they’ve only promised a hundred billion. And so I think that the 400 billion are supposed to come from we the taxpayers or somebody else, but not from them. And then I guess the second thing I wanted to say is that the problem with all of the technology that has entered medicine and medicine is still about a patient and a body. And the problem with it is that it has really taken the focus of the doctors away from the patients. It’s put it onto the paperwork. And so it has not helped the patient doctor relationship. It hasn’t helped patients feel listened to. It hasn’t helped patients get the kind of full assessment that they need to determine do they really need a drug, do they really need a procedure or do they really need something else because now the doctor fully understands what the situation is because he had time to listen or she had time to listen.
So I don’t see that technology is going to necessarily ensure unbiased decisions or good decisions or good medicine. But then the last thing I would say is I think there’s an unhealthy hope in AI and in DNA to solve healthcare’s problems. I really think this is a lot less about health, just like the entire evolution from real insurance and doctors been having independent practice that entire evolution from that to where we are today where the doctors are under control, they’re all entering data into systems that other people are using and profiting off of. So I think this is less about health and more about profit. And I think that big tech sees a big payoff. And I think I’ve always thought that President Trump really doesn’t understand healthcare, and so he is letting people say things to him and he is not totally sure about what the best thing is to do.
But I just want to talk for a moment about cancer. So I don’t know if your listeners know that NIH was actually doing tests of using Ivermectin to cure cancer before Covid. They never talked about this during Covid, they knew that Ivermectin was safe, safe, safe. They didn’t say, but there’s a physician who has found that her patients are actually being cured of cancer. She’s an oncologist. She never thought about it or just discovered these people who are using Ivermectin and actually curing their cancers. And she wanted to do a study. Nobody would fund the study. Why would that be? Is it because Ivermectin costs only two and a half cents a pill and nobody thinks that they’re going to get any profit off of the whole cancer industry if we learned that Ivermectin will cure it? So what is she doing? She got together five doctors and they’re doing their own study.
Epic Times Television actually interviews her, Dr. Kathleen Ruddy. So instead what we hear from Larry Ellison is we’re going to give dangerous MrNA shots that we know have endangered people and have caused damage and has never actually really had the kind of testing that it needed before they ever put them into people. And Moderna was failing before Covid because it couldn’t come up with anything that they could really sell. So now they’re trying to sell mRNA as the cure for cancer. And I think this is all about profiteering more than it is about health. I mean, it’s possible something could really come out of this, but for the most part, I don’t think it’s about health.
Sam Rohrer:
My family physician who I had on the program some time ago, we were talking about it and he made a very, very clear point that even if you can identify certain DNA markers or whatever that say you may be as a person, predisposed, perhaps maybe to cancer. There are many, many, many factors that can keep that from happening. Or there are things that can happen, but actually predicting it is just simply not possible. So it goes back to the aspect of what you are saying. You only have about two minutes left here in this segment, but before when we talked, you had said clearly that electronic health records already a part of the system prior to AI coming on board, was already working against the doctor patient relationship. Explain a little bit about the electronic health records and then ai, if it gets involved, it only makes that more of the same. Just briefly, why is electronic health records such a problem?
Twila Brase:
Yeah, I think I’m going to have to update my book for your listeners. I wrote Big Brother in the exam room, the Dangerous Truth about electronic health records. You can find it on Amazon. And the fact of the matter is that people who pushed the electronic health record and who pushed for HIPAA, which is not a privacy rule, it’s a data sharing rule, they push for these things because as soon as they could get access to your data without your consent through HIPAA, and then they could digitize it through the electronic health record, then they could gain money not only from having access to all of your information because you no longer have any control of who it goes to, but also by being able to profile the patient and the doctor, look into the exam room, track every doctor’s decision, penalize them for their decisions, control what their options are to treat a patient by only putting certain things for them to choose in the electronic health record.
And by virtue of this, they could keep all sorts of things from ever being ordered and they could control the doctors so that certain patients didn’t get certain kinds of treatment even though it’s available, even though it would be good for them, it’s not even in the electronic health record to order. So this is just a way of rationing care. The electronic health record is not there for your convenience. I mean it sounds convenient, right? But who doesn’t know that every time you go to the doc you fill out the same pieces, pieces of paper, and they all said no, that wouldn’t happen. Once they had your information, you’d never have to fill it out again. This was all a lie. So this entire system is meant for the outsiders. It’s meant for the profiteers, it’s meant for the surveyors. It’s meant for those who want to gain money. And just as one last little statistic, Optum Insights from UnitedHealth Group, they made $18.9 billion just from data. That’s all they do is data.
Sam Rohrer:
So ladies and gentlemen, now you know why information is important. The electronic digitization of it does not contribute a Twila saying to your better health. It actually increases the bottom line for those who use your data. Alright, we’ll just leave it at that. But that’s how it relates and doesn’t relate to health freedom. When we come back, we’re going to shift to the aspect of real id, which is coming down the pike. Talk about what it is and what we can do about it. Well, we’re now under our midpoint in the program today. And again, if you’ve just joined in, perhaps turned on your car radio or in your kitchen listening or wherever you may be, thanks for being on board. If you did not catch the first part of the program, I encourage you to go back and get it from the beginning on our app, stand in the Gap or on our website, stand in the gap radio.com.
Go back and listen to the program again. Again, access to transcript, which is there, it’s free. Pick it up and then you can take a look at it. But all of the things that we’re talking about connect from what was at the beginning of this program. And Twila, by the way, before I get into this segment, it was good to hear your voice on the spot in the middle. You do a minute program like I do, a minute program, your’s, the theme of health of some type. But I thought it was interesting. Now most of our listeners across the country will have that as a part of what they’re doing. A few may not. But I thought it was interesting that what you were talking about with Pfizer, an MrNA shot was exactly what we were talking about in the segment before. And I say the Lord just worked that out because it is a confirming aspect that what we’re talking about is not just something of the moment.
These are things that have been in process for a long time because it’s truthful what we’re saying. And anyway, I just want to compliment your minute. Programs are very, very good. Now, one of the most dangerous, we changed directions here a little bit, still connected ladies and gentlemen, to health freedom and you’ll see, but one of the most dangerous laws, in my opinion, ever passed by Congress was actually 20 years ago in 2005, this now being 2025. It was the Real ID Act passed four years after the nine 11 event. And justified in large part by that event the stated goal of real id. Then as stated by and for a current purpose, I just asked Wikipedia today what was the justification, real id? They said this quote for the purpose of preventing identity fraud. Boy that sounds good. Sounded good then, but we know now.
That was untrue then. And it is untrue today. Totally untrue as it is in reality, a national ID card, which is unlawful and always wherever it has occurred throughout any nation in history, a deadly threat to freedom. And though the implementation date of real ID passed in 2005 originally has been repeatedly postponed over the years, it’s now slotted to begin an incremental phase in on the beginning of May here just three months from now. So let’s start here. I’ve shared some of my thoughts on real id, but what else? Can you add anything else you’d want and how in your analysis of this law, if not stopped, how would its implementation connect to harming Health Freedom, which is our regular focus?
Twila Brase:
Well, thanks for asking that. Just for your listeners, if they go to cch freedom.org, we have an entire alert with action items and bottom lines and all sorts of things. And very soon it will have the opportunity to click and send a message to your member of Congress, which we wanted to have by today, but it just hasn’t worked yet. So anyway, I think the things that I would add, because a lot of people just think this is just another card, but it’s not just another card and then it’s not just a card. It is a system and it is a system of federal control. What people don’t understand is what the federal law says. And by the way, states did not have to conform to this federal law, but when Obama came out and said, you can’t fly state legislators didn’t know what to do, their constituents were calling them in fear that they couldn’t go to see their grandchildren or they couldn’t go to their snowbird place or they couldn’t fly to Europe or whatever.
And so legislators in 20 17, 20 18 just vowed to this and submitted and conformed. But the fact of the matter is in 20 2009, in 2008 when the first real ID regulation came out, legislators at the state level saw it for what it was a use for patient of state’s rights and a violation of privacy rights. And 37 states stood up. They passed laws that prohibited compliance with real ID or resolutions that opposed it. So 37 states and then Obama’s administration came out with this clever lie, legislators didn’t know what to do and they all passed it well. So now the TSA has 50% state compliance, but they do not have, I’m sorry, they have a hundred percent state compliance, all 50 states. But now they’re trying to get you to comply. They want card compliance, they want all of your cards to comply. This is where the American people must stand up.
And the reason why we must stand up is because once, if this happens, if we as an organization, we are leading the Fight business council for Health Freedom’s leading this fight, if we are unsuccessful, this will become a credential that is put on your private phone and will have a remote government will have remote real-time access. And if you think that’s farfetched, that’s actually what the organization, that is the main organization for all the DMVs around the country. That’s what they testified to Congress in December, 2023, that in there, they’re going to start hoping for about 2% of people to have it on their phone and then they’re just going to grow from there. So we must stop real id. It must stop compliance as individuals refuse to make our cards compliant because we’re headed towards a China like social credit system where this will be on our phones, remote accessible, real-time accessible.
They can just shut off our ID anytime they decide to. And so that’s what people have to see real id. As we are now trying to stop it at the congressional level and at the state level, we actually have a coalition of state legislators in about, I think it’s eight different states who are now starting to put out bills to refuse to comply. We encourage everybody to encourage their state legislators to join this battle, to stop the takeover, the federal takeover of everything. Oh, I forgot to mention one thing. The Secretary of Homeland Security has unilateral authority to decide what the card must be produced for. So the law says you can’t get into certain federal facilities, nuclear facilities, and onto commercial airlines without this real id. And those are the purposes, those three purposes. And then it says, and for any other purposes, as are determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security and in a rule, Homeland Security said they don’t have to go back to Congress or the president to expand it. And we believe that healthcare is the way that they could get every American to submit is to say that they needed to use the real ID to access medical care. Not everybody has to fly, but everybody needs access to a doctor. So I think you can perhaps see the danger.
Sam Rohrer:
Well, absolutely. I can see the danger. And twilight was when I saw the danger way back when this came into being. When I was in the Pennsylvania house, I became one of the lead opponents here on this level. And that’s how you and I came to first meet each other. And it is interesting that now we’re sitting here 20 years later and this is still happening. It has encountered significant opposition, but it still continues to grind along. Now, one element of it, ladies and gentlemen that we didn’t mention here today is it’s not just the card, it’s the use of your biometric information that is behind the picture on your card so that when you look in your phone, if it is your camera, it’s what it is. It’s proof taking your biometric. It’s like your DNA, it’s of your face. But that’s what you do when you step before a camera going on an airplane or anywhere else.
It’s that piece, the biometric that allows the cameras to scan the streets, to scan the football stadium and find everybody and identify every person sitting in the stands. It’s the biometric part of it. So you only got a couple minutes left here. Add anything you want to about that aspect because it was Larry Ellison, one of the big tech guys who said the AI data-driven piece would connect every individual camera on every policeman in the country, every dash cam on every police car, and individual citizens alike. They would all be connected to the system and the knowledge that they were all connected and being watched by AI would all make them better citizens and better cops. That’s what he said. And that’s what you’re talking about. And healthcare just slides right into that. So any other further comments you may have,
Twila Brase:
That certainly sounds very tyrannical, but he’s planning to make a lot of money off of that system and so we have to stop him. So several things. There are only 56% of cards today that are compliant. So they want to get the 44% of other cards and they’re doing progressive enforcement starting March 7th, unless we can stop them by Congress
Sam Rohrer:
May 7th,
Twila Brase:
Shutting down the rule.
Sam Rohrer:
May 7th.
Twila Brase:
What did I say?
Sam Rohrer:
March you mean?
Twila Brase:
Oh yeah, may. Sorry,
Sam Rohrer:
Go ahead. It’s
Twila Brase:
May 7th
And they’re going to do progressive enforcement for two years. And so all you have to do if you’re worried that will not be successful is get yourself a passport, which is a real id, compliant id, but it can’t be used to buy everything and all this kind of stuff. It’s not about that. They want everybody to have a real id. So don’t get a real id. And then when it comes to biometrics, when you’re at the airport, don’t look at that camera. Don’t walk by that camera and look at it. They’re taking pictures without you just standing in front of it. Senator Merkley, who’s a Democrat, just was on Twitter talking about how they took his picture when he wasn’t even in front of it and he was refusing to do it. So we need to stop this whole biometric facial scan system that they’re doing. You can opt out of it by law. You don’t have to go into it. And everybody should not go into it, into that system. Do not just comply, just say, I’m opting out. But don’t face the camera. Don’t look at the
Sam Rohrer:
Camera. And that gets in ladies and gentlemen to in the next segment, we’ll go more into what we can do, which will include, I’ll have, while I’ll restate some of what you just stated there and some things that are coming up that do offer some hope about which we need to know. We’ll be back in just a moment. Well, as we go into our final segment, we often refer to this as our solution segment or application segment, which I think is really, really important that that is done. The presenting of information is one thing, but if we don’t know what to do with it, well frankly, what good is it? It’s like reading the word of God. If we read the word of God and we gain truth and knowledge, but we walk away, that’s kind of like what the book of James talks about.
It’s like looking at ourself in the mirror and then walking away and just not changing anything. That’s not our goal here. Truth should change our lives, change our thinking. That’s what a biblical worldview is all about. But it doesn’t happen automatically. And as I’m going to be with George Barna this Friday and what we’re going to talk about in part of their next release, and you’ll hear him say, because I’m going to ask him the extent of or the small amount of people down to about 3% now of our entire nation, 3% who actually have a biblical worldview. Now think about that. That’s part of the reason why we’re in such a circumstance as we are today. So that’s not our goal here. Our goal is to change and counter the thinking of the world and to think truthfully, which comes off the page of scripture.
Okay, just a little bit of a background there. Alright, Twilight, you and CCH, freedom Citizens Council for Health Freedom. Again, that website, ladies and gentlemen, lots of information there. Things that we don’t post on our site because it’s not what we’re doing, but we do want to direct people if they want to know more to the various ministries in which we have regularly on here such as Twila, CCH freedom.org, that’s where you can go a lot of information. But Twila, you and your organization do more than any other single organization that I know of in the defending and fighting for the cause of health freedom and the promotion of legitimate and sound policies that strengthen health freedom in this country. And those two things, again, we talk a lot about doctor patient relationship and the overall integrity of the healthcare system. Now that being the case, can you share what you are doing in the area of informing the light in that area? And then specifically as we wrap up real ID and it’s current scheduled implementation because you had said something about there are some hopeful aspects, congressionally that may be under work. You need to share that at this moment to if you can.
Twila Brase:
Sure. So we have the Retirement Freedom Act and we have gotten agreement from Senator Cruz that he will reintroduce that bill and it lets people opt out of Medicare and keep their social security benefits and also not pay back any benefits that they have received. The Clintons made those two things, tie those two together and said that’s what would happen. You wouldn’t get social security and you’d have to pay it all back if you left later. So that’s what that bill is. And then Congressman Palmer from Alabama is also the house author for that and told us that that’s going to come out in about two to three weeks. So that’s very good. And then we have what we call a make health insurance Real again, bill, which we are working on, but the language isn’t out yet. And then at the congressional level for real, ID for the first 60 legislative days after a new administration comes into Power Congress can do what’s called a Congressional Review Act bill on any rule that they want to get rid of.
So we have asked them to get rid of the Progressive Enforcement real ID rule and we’re working with members of Congress to try to get this to happen. It’s no small thing. It’s really small. The bill’s really tiny, but actually to make it happen, take some work. And so we’ve only got 60 legislative days to make that happen. So that’s why we have online this alert and we expected to have just a link that you could click and it would send your message straight to your members. But since we’ve had a technological difficulty here, you can simply go to US Senate and you can put in your information, it’ll tell you who your senator is or the house, and they’ll tell you who your house member is and just send them a message. Or if you know them personally, send them a message and tell them to use a CRA Congressional Review Act.
Use the CRA to force the TSA to withdraw this unconstitutional Progressive Enforcement bill. What you can also do is contact Senator Rand Paul’s office. He is Chair of Homeland Security. This rule comes not only out of the TSA, but also out of the Department of Homeland Security. And he used to have a repeal real ID bill. So he’s within our thinking here. So the more people that contact him and say, use a CRA Congressional Review Act, use A CRA. If you use just CRA, they know what it means. Use A CRA to withdraw the TS a’s real ID rule. That’s all you’d have to communicate. I mean unconstitutional as tyrannical. It’s many things. Then contact your state legislators and say, you don’t have to conform to real id. Real id. This is unconstitutional. It takes away 10th Amendment powers of the state, takes away my freedom, my individual freedom and privacy rights, and asks them to put in a bill to repeal state conforming with real id then go to our website, read all about this.
You can read all about this at our website. We made it really simple. But also tell your friends and neighbors, look in your bill folder. Do you have a star? You have a star on your card, you’ve got a real, ID go in and get a standard id. There’s only five states that don’t allow it. And in our Real ID alert, we say what those states are. I know Texas and Wyoming are two of them that only allow you to have a real id. And you get some legislator to change that in those states. But also finally, just sign up on our homepage. At the very bottom of it, you can sign up. We only email you once a month and tell you things that are happening. But occasionally we will put out alerts like we put out an alert about real ID because it’s so important to engage the public in a timely manner.
Sam Rohrer:
Okay, Twila, that is excellent. CCH freedom.org. Ladies and gentlemen, you can get that many, many times contacting legislators on pieces of bills and so forth, often go nowhere. And generally people can get frustrated. But on an issue like this, in this beginning of this new administration contacting the good guys now who happen to be in a position to actually act favorably on such things we’re talking about today, perhaps has never been better. And so contacting is very, very, very, very important. So I would encourage us all to do that. Alright, Twila we’re just about the end, just very, very briefly, not real id, but what can individual listeners do to pursue sound healthcare freedom choices? One of ’em is going to try and use cash and that kind of thing. Just quickly highlight just a couple of those things in the last 30 seconds or so.
Twila Brase:
Yeah, use cash. Go find a direct pay doctor. You want a doctor who works for you and you want to make them not only survive but thrive. This is where the whole gist of healthcare should go is back to the patient doctor relationship, which happens with cash. And so I would encourage everybody to start thinking about how they can get out of the system. Even ask your employer to give you all of your money that they give to the health insurer. And you can maybe go into healthcare sharing, use all that money. We call it a 35% raise. If you got all the money, the employers, you get a 35% raise. Might as well use it how you want to.
Sam Rohrer:
Okay, that’s fantastic. And ladies and gentlemen, there are additional things, but what we just shared right there, very, very practical and very impactful. Twila Brase, citizens Council for Health Freedom. Thank you for being with me again today. Thank you for the work that you are doing. On the behalf of all of us, CCH freedom.org is her website. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for being a part pick up this program transcript available. You can get a better detail of what we talked about, act upon it, pray and as we say, stand in the gap for truth. Do what you can.
Recent Comments