Key Revelations: The Fruit of Honest Investigative Journalism
July 25, 2024
Host: Hon. Sam Rohrer
Guest: Leo Hohmann
Note: This transcript is taken from a Stand in the Gap Today program aired on 7/25/24. To listen to the podcast, click HERE.
Disclaimer: While reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate transcription, the following is a representation of a mechanical transcription and as such, may not be a word for word transcript. Please listen to the audio version for any questions concerning the following dialogue.
Sam Rohrer: Hello and welcome to this Thursday edition of Stand In the Gap Today, and our focus today is on key information revealed as a result of honest investigative journalism. In just a moment, I’m going to bring in Leo Hohmann. He’s an author, he’s a researcher, and he is an investigative journalist with me many times on this program, A favorite of so many of you who I know I hear from. And today we’re going to be talking about the substance of three different articles that he’s released in just the past three weeks. And I’ll just tell you upfront, he delivers a lot of articles on almost everything that I think is really important, and I think you would as well. Leo homan.com is one site. And then this newest one, which there is a lot more published on. It is Leo Hohmann.substack.com, and we’ll talk a bit more about that.
Sam Rohrer: But in any regard, let me get into it. The three articles that I’ve selected, he’s had done more than that in the last few weeks, but all of these are very relevant. None are being addressed in the controlled media. All should be matters of serious focus and discussion, I believe not only by the media of course, but also by our leading politicians who are currently in office or desire to be. Now, the title I’ve chosen for today’s program is this key revelations, the Fruit of Honest Investigative Journalism. Now, to give you a bit of a roadmap for today’s program, the next segment I’m going to talk to Leo about a recent article that he’s written entitled, who is JD Vance? Of course you’re listening, you know who JD Vance is, but do we know him first term, US Senator from Ohio. Now the official Republican vice presidential candidate recently announced by Donald Trump that JD Vance.
Sam Rohrer: Okay, segment three, I’m going to ask Leo to share more information about the recent major US government national security breach. You may not even heard of it, but why? There’s not much mention of it, what is known about it and the reality of it, why it’s such a potential impact, negative impact on US national security. In segment four, we’re going to consider just briefly the focus and the outcome of the World Economic Forum’s. Summer gathering held the end of May in China, often referred to as summer DeVos, which occurred as I said at the end of May, at the same time that the World Health Organization gathering was happening in Geneva, Switzerland, and we were covering that a great deal here on the program, but with that roadmap upfront. Leo, welcome to the program.
Leo Hohmann: Yeah, Sam, thanks for having me back.
Sam Rohrer: Leo, let’s just talk a little bit about you and journalism. I think we can take a lot of things for granted and just assume everybody understands, but here’s what I want to ask you. You’ve personally obviously gone into the field of what we call journalism, and I know from other discussions with you, you do that because God has directed you to do that and it’s a field in which you like. Obviously you enjoy, you do well, but there’s also a purpose for it. Now, here’s my question. How would you define investigative journalism, Leo, and how would you differentiate it from say, the average news article? What’s the difference?
Leo Hohmann: Well, investigative means what it says. You’re investigating something. You’re trying to dig beyond just the daily headlines and the daily narrative, especially the daily narratives put out by the mainstream corporate media, which all seems to sing from the same exact song sheet. You find very little diversity for liberal journalists who pride themselves in diversity. You actually see almost no diversity of reporting. If you look at the major conservative sites like Fox News All and Newsmax and maybe a couple of others basically report on the same themes every day with the daily news cycle. Then you have your CNN and your M-S-N-B-C, Washington Post New York Times, all going with similar themes on their side. So you end up with this dichotomy of this left right paradigm that has divided America. And it’s really a false paradigm in my opinion, because nobody seems to be out there just looking at where the facts would lead the typical American. They start out with an agenda instead of just pursuing the facts no matter where they lead. And that to me is the hallmark of true professional journalism, whether investigative or not, you are simply following the facts and not all just going with this dominant theme, this dominant narrative. It’s more like what they call PAC reporting or herd reporting. Just follow the herd and go with the dominant narrative. Never question it. That’s not journalism. And when we talk about investigative journalism, we are talking especially about questioning everything that the establishment throws at us.
Sam Rohrer: Okay, now let me just go a little further here in the last couple of minutes. Investigative journalism, you’re digging a little bit deeper. You’re going where the facts lead you. You’re not trying to present facts to make a case. You’re trying to uncover the facts to present the truth more of what news used to be like in the past, but we know has changed so much over the years. I threw in this word honest investigative journalism, and that’s kind of what you’re already talking about. But how can the truth seeking reader, the citizen who wants to know the truth and everybody is seeking for and wanting to know what they read, is it true? Is it not true? Are there some marks when you talk about an investigative research article, the kinds that you write, is there something that marks them that a person can look and say, right, this is likely true as compared to this is likely a piece of propaganda?
Leo Hohmann: Absolutely. And the number one, there are many things, but the number one thing on my list of markers that I would look for to distinguish whether something is honest investigative journalism or dishonest is who is funding the research? Just like we have scientific studies that are funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation or the Soros Open Society, we would not trust that the conclusion of those scientific studies because we know that the scientists are being paid by people with a very strong agenda. Well, it’s the exact same thing with journalism. All journalism is funded by some source. When you look at Fox News, C-N-N-M-S-N-B-C, their biggest source of funding right now is the pharmaceutical industry. So how can we look to them for honest reporting on gene therapeutic drugs? And so-called vaccines, we can’t. Same thing goes with my source of funding. Who is funding my research, my writing. I have no corporate donors whatsoever, my substack. That’s one reason why I opened a Substack account because people who read my content are the ones paying for a subscription.
Sam Rohrer: And with that, we’re going to have to break it off. I may come back and ask a little bit more because you gave one marker who’s funding the research? And ladies and gentlemen, that is a big one because you always follow the money. We’ve seen how that has impacted things. Stay with us. We come back, we’ll go to the first article about who is JD Vance. If you’re just joining us today, my special guest is Leo Holman, author, researcher, independent investigative journalist websites, Leo Hohmann.com and Leo Hohmann.substack.com. A lot more on that last site. And I would encourage you to go there. There’s a lot of information. That’s all I can say. It’s a good place to go. The theme today is this, I’ve entitled this key revelations, the Fruit of Honest Investigative Journalism. And I said that because whenever there is honest investigative journalism, there will always be truth that comes from it.
Sam Rohrer: Key revelations is what I’m calling it. Leo. Now that the Republican Convention is completed and we now officially have a Trump Vance ticket, you appropriately did some investigation into the well, relatively new name, mostly new name on the ticket VP candidate JD Vance. Now we do know this first term, US Senator from the state of Ohio. You entitled the article Who is JD Vance? Very simple title and everybody’s asking that question because very few people, including myself, know an awful lot. And we do need to know. Now, in the first lines of the article, which you published just prior to j d’s acceptance speech, you did it on July 17th, and he accepted that evening, he wrote these words, JD Vance is going to deliver the keynote speech at tonight’s RNC. He’s an unlikely pick for Trump’s vice president given his history as a never Trumper, but who is the man behind the public persona?
Sam Rohrer: That is Ohio Senator JD Vance, and you’re continuing to write, by all accounts, his personal life appears stellar, a family man, a recent convert to Catholicism. And he said, so far all good, but what about his business ties? Alright, so with that in mind, Leo, most of your article ended up dealing with J D’s business connections. So I’m just going to give you an open forum right now. Give us an overall view if you could, of the most significant facts publicly available because you put all the links in there, and I think you didn’t say it on the other side, just ran out of time. But a good investigative journalist will give links, which you always do in your program so people can go and read for themselves. But in that regard, publicly available. But I’m going to say what things came out as a result of your investigative aspect into this person, JD Vance and his business connections
Leo Hohmann: In many ways, JD Vance is the Republican version of Barack Obama back in 2007, 2008. He’s only been in the Senate, the US Senate for a couple of years. I don’t even think it’s been two full years yet. He’s come out of nowhere. He’s very young. He’s only 39 years old. So I felt like people needed to know more than just what’s coming out of his mouth on a campaign stump speech. And so I looked into his background and like I said, he is married to a Hindu woman, he converted to Catholicism. There’s nothing really to criticize there other than it does seem little strange if you were a recent convert to Catholicism and you’re married to a Hindu, and I don’t even know that they’ve been married all that long. But anyway, his business background is the most interesting. He is the head of a venture capital firm that he started called Venture Capital, and they are invested in a company called Amplify Bio, which is a biotech company.
Leo Hohmann: Started in 2021 with $200 million in startup funding. And 100 million of that came from a very technocratic transhumanist type nonprofit company called Barnell. And the other a hundred million came from three venture capital firms, one of which is JD Vance’s Narya Capital. And we also learn, and this is all in the local newspaper by the way, open sourced at the Columbus. I believe it’s the Columbus dispatch in Columbus, Ohio, which would be his local newspaper. And another article I found in Rolling Stone says that they cited SEC documents and I check those up and they are accurate that JD also has a hundred thousand dollars of his own personal money invested in Amplify buyout. Now, what does Amplify buyout? They test Mr. mRNA drugs, mRNA gene therapy treatments, and that main partner Baral is also connected to Moderna, worked with Moderna in testing their COVID-19 mRNA.
Leo Hohmann: So-called vaccine. And so you can see the very sketchy connections here to what we would consider an unbiblical scientific use of basically false gene manipulating the human genome to manipulate God’s created genome into something that it was never intended to be. And another thing I found was his connection to Peter Thiel, who was a very well-known technocrat and transhumanist. Peter Thiel works with the CIA and the NSA and prophets off of the surveillance state. He has a company called Palter, which checks social medias across all platforms and finds Americans who are maybe too conservative and labels them as dangerous extremists. This is Peter Thiel’s company, Palter Peter Thiel is also on the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group. Sam, which as we know is a one world, very secretive, one world organization trying to create a one world government. And so there are definitely connections to JD Vance that we should be concerned about.
Sam Rohrer: Alright, and I found that that’s interesting. And some listening links say, wow, some may say, well, that’s not fair to make these connections. Well, it is the truth. So the connections are there. And others would say, well, I don’t see the problem, so let’s go just a little bit deeper on that. Now, one thing I noticed, and again, I looked at the information. Peter Thiel, as you commented on, he happened also highly invested in J D’s election because he put in $10 million himself into a super PAC for the purpose of j d’s first run there in Ohio. So I do know this from a candidate perspective as I’ve run twice statewide here in Pennsylvania that anybody who does a super PAC for you, and anytime you get large volumes of money in a $10 million chunk in a state race is a big piece, you know that person, you have some type of a relationship, there is a connection that will be far ongoing beyond that election.
Sam Rohrer: So you’re saying that’s not a sketchy connection, that’s a very close connection and it’s significant. But let’s go back here. You’ve already mentioned a little bit about the involvement in the gene therapy. Amplify bio, put some into the category of Moderna, big pharma experimentation on gene therapy, which as you say, a big problem with that is gene therapy is experimental. They’re trying to do work on vaccines, which then you can bypass the normal 10 to 15 year trial period. So there’s a problem with that, but as Bill Gates said, and I think you put it in his article that Bill Gates says, oh, this is a great place to be from an investment perspective because I’ve made more money in vaccines that I made on anything. So these kind of problems and red flags, did you raise as a part of his involvement in Amplify bio? Anything more on that area?
Leo Hohmann: No, I just thank you for pointing out that the connection is direct because Peter Thiel single handedly bankrolled in finance JD Vance’s senate campaign two years ago, and his involvement with JD Vance goes all the way back to JD’s time at Harvard, excuse me, Yale. Yale University Law School. That’s where he met. And so he is a direct disciple of Peter Teal. He considers Teal one of his mentors. And so this is not just some loose connection, it’s very deep and very direct.
Sam Rohrer: Alright, so the connection business wise has an involvement in gene therapy, Mr. NA experimentation, gene therapy and big pharma. We all know that is a big issue that came out in the last four years. The Thiel connection, as you’re calling it out, his involvement with the entities he works for would put him into the category that most conservative understand as the military industrial complex. Is that right? Is that how you would describe that?
Leo Hohmann: Yes, because he contracts with, he provides through his company Palter services to the surveillance state, to the military industrial complex, the CIA, the NSA, the Department of Defense. And then when you add into that his high up position in the Berg Group, which meets annually in Europe to discuss privately how they can move the world towards a one world government, I think there’s real problems with that perspective and its connection to JD Vance. Now, another thing that should be pointed out is Peter Thiel is also a good friend of President Trump and is also a big donor to the Trump campaign in general, not just JD Vance. So this is where I’m delving a little bit into my own opinion and presumption.
Sam Rohrer: Alright, well hold it, hold it. Just if you don’t mind, let’s start the next segment with you offering what your personal views are. We’ll talk about that a little bit. Ladies and gentlemen, stay with us. I’ll continue my discussion now with Leo Hohmman when we return in just a little bit. Okay, Leo, I want to go back to you and let you complete that thought and you were about to offer your personal opinion. And again, an investigative journalist honest reporting should be writing as unbiasedly as possible, but you’re going to step aside and offer some opinion now on your side. Go ahead and offer your opinion. Now,
Leo Hohmann: This is just a hunch on my part. I can’t prove it, but given the facts that I’ve collected, my opinion is that President Trump most likely chose JD Vans as his vice presidential running mate on the advice and the word of Peter Thiel because Peter Thiel is a good friend of President Trump’s. He runs in the same circles with President Trump. He donates heavily to President Trump’s reelection campaign. And if somebody like Peter Thiel had put forth a potential nominee to President Trump, this is something that president that would move him directly to the top of the list for President Trump. I’m not saying he was the only one that was ever considered, but certainly if someone like Peter Thiel comes to you and you’re friends with him and he’s a multi-billionaire worth $11 billion, president Trump was going to respect that opinion. And so I think that’s what got JD Vance propelled basically out of nowhere into the group of three or four finalists that President Trump had to choose from. And I’m not saying I should add Sam, that I’m not telling anyone that they should not vote for President Trump based on this information. I simply wanted to get it out there so that people would have all of the information available to them so that they can make an educated decision, and that is strictly up to them. You could certainly make the case obviously, that President Trump, regardless of who he picked as his vice presidential nominee, is the lesser of two evils at worst and compared to the opposition in the Democratic Party.
Sam Rohrer: And I think that’s fair enough, and I think our listeners, Leo, are educated enough to understand that as citizens in these United States, and I’m going to say as Christians citizens, what we hope to get and what we should always get is knowledge, pray for wisdom to interpret it, to make the kind of decisions in life we make when we’re talking about something that will be in the case, like an election type of a vote here, more or less. But it goes far, far beyond that. The problem in our age, Leo, as we’ve talked about so oftentimes is that the information that we have been getting for so long is purposely twisted, turned, redefined, that it is extraordinarily difficult for people to know what is the truth. I think what you just said is very good for the purpose of these are facts, these are things that people ought to know, ought to factor into their thinking and becomes a part of informed citizenry process.
Sam Rohrer: So we’re just going to leave it right there. Again, these details, the links and all of that, then anybody can go to and check further is in this document, this article you wrote about, who is JD Vance and it’s available@leoholman.substack.com. Okay, let’s go to another article here. That was, again, very recently done. Matter of fact, just yesterday, if this date is right, you published an article entitled US Government suffers major national security breach, the consequences of which could be devastating. Now, under that title you wrote, I’m going to say a subtitle. You said this, some of federal government’s potentially most sensitive national security related files are now in the hands of an unknown entity likely to put them up for sale. Okay, now my guest, Leo, is that most of our listeners are probably not even aware of this enormous national security breach who had affected types of information that was stolen and what may be done with it.
Sam Rohrer: Likely, ladies and gentlemen, most of you are aware of the Microsoft problem, that CrowdStrike was a part of it that implemented last week that for a portion of time anyway shut down portions of the entire globe banking and airlines and a whole lot of things. But Leo, it seems like to me that there are so many recurring incidences of cyber attacks and theft of information that’s happening all the time that it’s almost like, well, you get up and you listen to the weather and you say, well, it’s going to storm this afternoon. We had rain this morning, we had another cyber attack this morning. It’s almost become like that and it’s almost like no news. But in this case, tell us the details of what this T was about and why it is so potentially compromising our national security as much as you can share.
Leo Hohmann: Yeah, this was not widely reported. So you’re exactly right that most of your listeners, unless they’d read my article or one of a couple of other outlets, they wouldn’t even know about it. As far as I know, it was only reported by Bloomberg and Reuters. If Fox News or anything like that reported it at all, it was downplayed. It was not at all focused upon. And it involves a hack of a company called Leidos Holdings. I’d never heard of this company, but they’re a $4 billion company with almost all of its contracts, 87% of them being the federal government and other governments around the world. Their clients include the Pentagon, the Department of Defense, nasa, Homeland Security, and other federal agencies. And they’re an IT contractor. So they’re providing IT services for the government and some of the government’s most sensitive national security agencies. And that has now been breached.
Leo Hohmann: Some 480 some files are now in the hands of this enemy hacker. We’re not sure who it is. One thing we are sure of is that it’s going to be put out there for the potentially for purchase by the Russians, the Chinese, the North Koreans, Iranians, or whoever foreign enemies may want to purchase it. And the bigger question that this story really poses, Sam, is how safe in a broader context, are the government contractors data the sensitive data held by government contractors? They outsource almost our government outsources. This is what people don’t understand. Our federal government and many of our states, they outsource almost everything to private companies now. And so people think it’s in the hands of some secretive agency, but that agency is contracting with another company which then can get breached and then it can be put out for bid to the highest and it’s no longer a state secret. So look for more of this as we’re entering what appears to be World War III with Russia and China, Sam, and this Battle of World War III will not just be fought kinetically on the battlefield. It will be fought in cyberspace. And this is a good example of it right here.
Sam Rohrer: Okay, and that’s one I was going to ask you that you went there because you said quote, the consequences of this breach, the consequences of which could be devastating in what you said and what we’ve talked about, what I’ve talked about with many other guests on this program for a long time is that we’ve actually been in a war with the enemies of the world, the China, the Russia, the North Koreans, the Iranians and others. And at this juncture, yeah, there are some fighting on the ground, Russia and Ukraine, there’s fighting in the Middle East, but the war has been going on for a long time. A lot of it in this space we call cyber space because that’s where so much information is. To what extent are you able to talk about, I guess you don’t really know what was involved here, but the kind of information that the government would hold, Pentagon, Homeland Security, do you know what kind of information they’re actually holding that they may have gotten hold of?
Leo Hohmann: Well, if it’s IT services that would include all sorts of files. They say that it’s in zip drives, it’s in Word documents, JP form PDF forms and several other forms. And that these files are associated with this contractor’s technical assistance to its customers, which involves these sensitive national security agencies. So basically all that would include all communications, that would include all images. When you’re talking JPEGs and PNG files and PDF files would include all the memos. Endless, endless. They would have access to untold information in information. I think 480 some files that they now have possession of.
Sam Rohrer: Okay, and ladies and gentlemen, we bring this up. I’m just bringing this up as an example of the types of things that information comes out. I’m calling it the fruits of honest investigation, and these are the kinds of things that come out. We’ve got only about 45 seconds left. I have to go, Leo, but you mentioned follow the money from the standpoint of investigative journalists that you can trust, follow the money that makes a difference. What about those who cite sources of those who do not cite sources? Is that a mark that somebody can look for?
Leo Hohmann: Yes, it is. The Washington Post is the paper of record for Washington and the New York Times is the paper of record in New York City. Wall Street and Wall Street Journal typically is also involved. These three papers are noted for articles that are based on anonymous sources. They do not tell you where they’re getting it from. That opens up a huge can of worms and it really exposes them as not a journalistic enterprise that is separate from the government but actually entangled with the government. Okay,
Sam Rohrer: Very good. Ladies and gentlemen, stay with us. We’ll come back to the last segment. We’re going to go to some things that came out of the summer DeVos meeting in China, the end of May. Well, before we go into our final segment, just a reminder to all who are listening that when you listen to the programs, you can go back and listen to them again. I encourage you to do so. So much information like today, a lot of different things have been said that it’s nice to go back, listen to the program again, stand in the gap radio.com or on our app where so many people go, you can also access now a transcript of the program that then you can read along, you can underline, you can go back and things that you weren’t able to write down you can find. I encourage you to do that in a case like this.
Sam Rohrer: When we’re actually looking at today three specific investigative articles that Leo Holman has written, that full article, which is not in the transcript because we’re not giving the whole article, but you can find that entire article at a website and I’ll give you this one, the better place to go because there’s far more of them. And that is Leo Hohmann.substack.com, Leo Hohmann.substack.com. And therefore I encourage you to do that. If you listen to the program, millions do it across the country. We’re on over about 550 stations here. It’s a lot of people listen and you listen because you want to know the truth from a biblical worldview perspective. That is our commitment. So these sources, I tell you are where you can go to read more and seek God’s wisdom for how to apply them into your life. That’s their whole goal. Not what to think, but how to think and how to think biblically.
Sam Rohrer: That is our mission and something for which I asked you to pray regularly for us. Okay, Leo. Now, during the exact time when the World Health Organization was meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, we, and I’m going to say most all freedom loving people who were at all looking at what took place there. We were focused the end of May on that organization. They were attempting to usurp national sovereignty. They didn’t get it officially in a good way, but they made some major decisions after everybody. The delegates were there. They’re a dictatorial entity there. The World Health Organization and the United Nations unelected, all of them self-appointed their world tyrants, just like the folks in the World Economic Forum who was meeting at the same time in China for their summer DeVos meeting. Now, you wrote an article right after that and you entitled it. I think it was this globalist front man, Klaus Schwab tells elitist followers, they must force humanity into a world ruled by ai, artificial intelligence, and other dehumanizing technologies. Okay, first question I want to have ask to you here. Do you know what Klaus Schwab mentioned in that meeting when he said by force, what does that mean and how might these guys unelected, but obviously wielding a great deal of power? How might it happen?
Leo Hohmann: Yeah, that he left that open to our imagination and as far as what he meant by the word force, but we can only presume based on past experience that he’s referring to the vast power structure that’s in place in the world in terms of the financial situation. Everything is financial. In the current world order, you have central banks that really call the shots behind the scenes of government policy. Whether the country is third world or first world, it has a central bank that is in charge of issuing the money. Lord Rothschild said that if I control the money, I care not who makes its laws, who makes the country’s laws just give me control over the money. And so if these politicians do not cooperate with the agenda of the World Economic Forum and the central banks, they can simply have the economic rug pulled out from under them, crash their national economy, and that means the fall of their government.
Leo Hohmann: So of course the politicians, when it comes where the rubber meets the road are going to put in certain policies. We saw that with President Trump. He was a good president until the last, what, eight, 10 months of his presidency. And then he basically undid all of the progress he’d made in terms of the economy and the conservative agenda. He allowed Dr. Fauci to force his hand implementing lockdowns and taking away freedoms with the whole Covid agenda. At the same time he was talking against it. He was doing nothing to prevent it. And so while he may have meant well, he buckled under the pressure of the globalist financial stranglehold.
Sam Rohrer: And that’s important to look back because these world Economic Forum people, well obviously we’re cooperating with the United Nations people because that was a part of how all of a sudden bang, the entire world all does the same thing and locks everybody down that force. I would qualify that as an evidence of force. They cause things to happen. Now, the World Health Organization, under what I just talked about and we talked about before, are wanting this ability to declare a health emergency before it happens, the pandemic part of it, and basically tell the whole world what to do. And so those kinds of things are the kinds of things that can work. Now, let’s go to this. In the last couple minutes he talked about how ai, artificial intelligence can be used as a tool by these people to rule the world. Explain just a little bit how that may already be done in part, I think it is, but how that may be fully worked out using artificial intelligence to do more and go further than anybody can imagine.
Leo Hohmann: Absolutely. AI is just now starting to come into its own. So we’re only beginning to see the very start of what it is capable of, Sam, and it’s getting better and better. You answer the phone now and sometimes you can’t tell if it’s a real person or a bot that is talking to you on the other end of the phone line. That’s because the AI software is able to replicate the human voice so much better than it ever used to be. They can replicate a politician’s voice. There was some conjecture, and it is just conjecture at this point that the phone call that President Biden called in on during the Kamala Harris campaign event a few days ago may not have actually been him, that it could have been ai. It sounded like Joe Biden, but then it didn’t sound quite perfectly like Joe Biden.
Leo Hohmann: So we may never know if that was actually him or not. And so we can be deceived, I guess is what I’m saying, very easily with the new advances in AI through videos that aren’t actually real and we think they are through voice replications of some politician or some person that it’s not really them. They could destroy a person through the use of ai. They can control people through the use of AI, through the whole propaganda herd mentality, and they can create false pandemics through ai and then vaccines that replicate the pandemic. That’s what happened with Covid. They’re using AI now to create MrNa vaccines, mapping out the gene sequence of these viruses very quickly and then coming up with a vaccine in a matter of weeks or months. Whereas it used to take 10 to 12, 15 years to develop a safe and effective vaccine. Now they’re coming out with them in weeks or months. And that’s why people like Bill Gates is so excited about this technology because think of the money that can be made simply by applying AI to the vaccine gene therapy sequences.
Sam Rohrer: Alright, and Leo Hohmann, we’re done. We’re out of time today. Thanks for being with us. His website, Leo Hohmann.substack.com. Again, all of our archive programs at stand the gap radio.com. Thank you for being with us today. Pursue this information further. Get these articles, read them for yourself. Listen to the program again. Pray for wisdom. God will give it. Pray for wisdom in these days to sort out the truth from the enormous amount of deception and God will give it to us.
Recent Comments