Experiencing the Unexpected:
A Strategic Analysis of the Trump Policy Change Blitzkrieg
Feb. 10, 2025
Host: Hon. Sam Rohrer
Guest: JR McGee
Note: This transcript is taken from a Stand in the Gap Today program aired on 2/10/25. To listen to the podcast, click HERE.
Disclaimer: While reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate transcription, the following is a representation of a mechanical transcription and as such, may not be a word for word transcript. Please listen to the audio version for any questions concerning the following dialogue.
Sam Rohrer:
Hello and welcome to this Monday edition of Stand In the Gap Today in another full week of programming, identifying key headline and culture issues from a biblical worldview perspective. Now today, JR McGee strategic leadership and counter-terrorism Specialist teaching electronic and information warfare to our military’s best for over 33 years is joining me again for our monthly review of global events, primarily not only from a military and strategic perspective, but if you’ve listened to this program before, all shaped by a conscious decision to bring our thinking into alignment with God’s thinking as revealed in God’s word. And that is in essence, that is what a biblical worldview is all about. Now let me say that just as a highly watched football game last night, as many did when the Eagles achieved an amazing victory over the Chiefs at a 40 to 22 win, using that as an illustration where there is a contest, a battle, or an ongoing war, there will always be a victory and no victory, whether it’s on the football field or a corporate boardroom or an individual’s earthly life or a nation on the global stage.
No place can a victory ever occur without a well-planned and executed strategy and permitted in the end ultimately by God because he overrules in his sovereign will in the affairs of men. But for us as believers, the word of God is our strategy book. It’s our operations manual. It’s our source of unchanging truth. That alone also foretells the essentials of what is happening today in our world and will happen yet tomorrow. In addition, God’s word tells us of God’s strategy and the prescription for how we can embrace the certainty of the end the game since the last chapter’s already been written and that we can possess full knowledge of our age with the certainty that we will be confronted not with less, but I’m going to say more perilous days marked by what? Well deception, clever coercion, and an unstoppable march to a global antichrist to government.
We know that because that’s what the Bible says. Yet we have an absolute assurance that victory is certain and that evil and evil doers will in the end be subdued by the very breath of Jesus Christ at the end of the tribulation and all being forced to bow before the God of heaven and confess that Jesus Christ alone is God to the glory of God the Father. Amen. Isn’t that amazing? That’s great. Now with that introduction to this week of programming, let me move to the focus of today’s program with my guest, JR McGee, and the title I’ve chosen now about a month ago, JR. Was with me and our focus then was 2025, expecting the unexpected, anticipating the anticipated where we considered how that for numerous reasons, 2025 would be a year of unexpected changes on one hand, but a year of change where we should anticipate based on our knowledge of biblical prophecy anticipated things. But now three weeks from the Trump inauguration, sweeping changes both domestic and global, surpass anything anybody I think could have imagined. So today’s program will pick up from our January seven program and consider the changes now being made from then to now. So the title I’ve chosen for today is this, experiencing the Unexpected, a Strategic Analysis of the Trump Policy Change Blitz Creek. And with that, I welcome JR Jr. Thanks for being back here today.
JR McGee:
It’s always a pleasure to be with you and our audience. Sam and boy, do we have a lot to talk about today?
Sam Rohrer:
Yeah, we sure do. And JR in the next two segments, we’re going to get more into the details of the Trump policy, blitzkrieg changes, we’re calling it impacting global relationships in particular and how they fit a strategy for victory. And you’ll describe that, but to open the program, I’d like your overall evaluation of the Trump policy changes that we’re describing as a literal Blitzkrieg. What’s the closest historical comparison that you can draw to what we’re seeing and what does the volume and the speed of the changes that we’re seeing tell you about the pre-planning that must have gone into all of this?
JR McGee:
Well, Sam, that’s a loaded question, but there’s several different examples, but there’s two in particular that I think everyone will resonate with. One is in World War II, Germany attacked Western Europe with what was a Blitz Creek. Now I speak German and the literal translation for Blitzkrieg is lightning war, and that’s exactly what happened. France fell in days, Belgium fell, everybody fell, even the British were driven off the beach in Dunkirk faster than anybody ever thought could possibly occur In modern days, in the first Gulf Storm battle, Tommy Franks executed a blitzkrieg around behind, I’m sorry, Saddam Hussein in his forces and attacked from the rear and overwhelmed them in less than a hundred hours, which is still almost unheard of even today. A Blitzkrieg is where you overwhelm your opponent with pure velocity. The velocity is in and of itself, the weapon and what we’re right this moment is an overwhelming speed of change.
The opponents, the ones who are trying to maintain the status quo, don’t have time to react before the next two changes have been implemented. Now, the thing about this is this required enormous planning and detail that if you look, I don’t care what you think about it, good or bad, just look at what’s occurring. It’s speed. They have put together a plan with an overarching focus of returning things back to the way that they were, and they’re doing that with velocity. All of these actions seem chaotic because they’re happening so fast, but they’re anything but chaotic. They’re planned and they’re sequenced. They’re coming in a specific order, they’re attacking the elements that they need to deal with first. If you’re going to control spending, you’ve got to go after the source of money. If you’re trying to figure out where abundant waste is coming go after the organization that’s distributing almost unlimited amounts of money around the world, that was U-S-A-I-D and the Treasury.
Those are the first two things that were really focused upon, and that’s what you have to get control of if you’re going to control money, all these other things that are happening. Let’s face it, he’s got between 250 and 300 executive orders. So far unheard of. Each one of those executive orders was well planned, well thought through, well drawn up, executed, and executed in the order that they needed to be done in order to implement things in a preplanned preconceived strategy. No matter what you think about this, the strategy behind it is very effective and it’s being very effectively executed. There’s a lot of people trying to throw sand in the gears, but that’s the best that they can do with a strategy of this nature is to just try to slow it down.
Sam Rohrer:
Okay, and with that, JR ladies and gentlemen, we set up the program for today, the theme, experiencing the unexpected, a strategic analysis of the Trump Policy Change, Blitzkrieg. We’ve already commented on a lot of that. We’ll go into further detail when we come back. If you’re just joining us today here on this Monday program on Standing in the gap today, my special guest is JR McGee. He’s with me generally at least once a month, and we try to deal with headline news more, not exclusively, but oftentimes more international or global type policy things, but always from a military perspective, which is the expertise in the background of JR, but always through the lens and the filter of biblical truth and prophecy, particularly as we visit and discuss anything related the Middle East, because you just simply can’t do it. Other than that, at least honestly.
But that being the case program today is this experiencing the unexpected, a little bit of a follow up to a January 7th program that we did and where we looked ahead pre inauguration and considered 2025 and the major changes that we anticipated happening, and now we’re coming back into it after three weeks of the Trump administration and the extraordinary changes that we’re seeing, which we just commented on. So if you didn’t catch us in the first segment, you want to go back and listen to that segment as it sets the stage for what we’re doing now. But JR in a program that I did last week here, I said in regard to Trump’s operative methodology, because people are trying to figure out why is he doing what he’s doing so forth. And I said, well, let’s just back up and look at this because when I look at it, there is no question.
His operative methodology is brash. It is arrogant, it is governed by pragmatism, which is by nature, by its definition, human wisdom, and that’s what it is, and that’s what it says, and it’s very clear he makes his intentions known upfront generally and pretty much says where he’s going to go. So it’s generally not a surprise. Now, compared to his predecessors like a Biden and Obama and Clinton, I would describe them more docile and deceptive, and they were clearly governed by Marxist ideology, very clear they operated, those guys operated in the shadows of corruption and bribery using promises of fame and money or power to entice or coerce compliance from those they wanted. And we see that now being dug out and made known from a global perspective, Trump has issued a number of statements that to some appear unhinged perhaps, but upfront nonetheless. So let’s talk about some of these in this segment and next JR.
Early on, Trump said that he wanted to quote, for instance, own Greenland, and instead of going to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, he also threatened tariffs on Canada and Mexico, still ongoing and went as far as poking Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau by saying that if Trudeau didn’t bow or get on board that Canada, well then would just, they’d become the 51st state. People chuckled. They thought, oh man. Now here’s my question. What are your thoughts on these statements into which you could also perhaps include the threat to take back the Panama Canal? Is there a strategy? Are they connected? What perhaps are the motivations and the goals from your information military perspective?
JR McGee:
Well, not only are they not unhinged, this is strategy at a level we have not seen since Winston Churchill and Roosevelt sat down in 1942 to determine what strategy they were going to use to win World War II. Now, that strategy was ultimately very effective. There were ups and downs, we won some battles, lost some battles, but overall, the strategy that was developed by those two, actually three, Stalin was involved with that, but the strategy developed by them was ultimately responsible for winning World War II. These things are absolutely strategic. People do not understand how important the Arctic is to being able to secure your country and dominate the global commerce system. Think about it for a second. The Arctic contains almost unmeasurable oil, minerals and rare earths. It’s also strategic. Any missile attack that’s going to come through the United States is going to come across the Arctic, Greenland and Canada and some of the Baltics like Norway and Swindling and Finland, they own almost all of the real estate in the Arctic.
Russia has built 42 Arctic cutters. We have two, and one of them is so broken, it probably will never work again. Trump and his team absolutely recognize just how vital the Arctic is for America’s national security needs. So this issue with Canada and Greenland are not off the wall. They’re incredibly strategic. This is where the battle for the 21st century is going to take place and you throw in the Panama Canal, we have to have some ability to move assets from the Atlantic to the Pacific, and we can’t get aircraft carriers through there. And some of our largest cruisers can’t go through there, but probably 80% of our Navy can go through the Panama Canal and they have to go unrestricted. If China owns both ends of that canal, they can strategically sink a couple of ships in that canal and block it off for the foreseeable future.
Trump’s putting all these things together in a way that makes a tremendous amount of sense strategically, and I teach a class in international negotiation skills. Nobody goes with the first offer. What Trump’s done is he’s made the first offer in negotiations. Everybody comes back with a counter and then there’s a counter, and eventually you find someplace in the middle where everybody can agree to. That’s precisely what’s going on with Canada and Greenland, and it’s kind of interesting. Denmark kind of owns Greenland. In 2009, Greenland achieved autonomy and they have some oversight from Denmark, but Greenland’s basically its own country now. But Denmark recently announced this weekend they want to pursue a let’s buy California and Disneyland approach, and I think California for Greenland is pretty fair for all parties concerned to back away from the humorous part of this. And it is funny, but the strategic value of this is immeasurable and Trump and Elon Musk and some of his key leadership, they recognize this and they’re taking steps to do what’s necessary to form the alliance and put together the pieces that they’re going to need to put together in order to protect the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Sam Rohrer:
Okay, Jr, you’ve laid a number of things on the table, probably number even considered, such as the importance of the Arctic and things that are happening. But let me go in a follow up here now, because in the Arctic you’re talking about that it is Russia, it is China. Both of them are doing things there. As you’re talking now, before Trump was inaugurated, he said regarding the Ukraine, Russia war, and that’s the connection here. When I asked you about, he said, if he had been in power, there never would’ve been a war there. Well, there is a war. And he said, we’ll bring it quickly to an end. Right now, it’s not to an end, but there are some things going on. But nonetheless, there are things going on up there in the Baltic with Russia and or China assumed to be ones that are, for instance, cutting undersea communication cables and some energy cables perhaps. But that whole area is developing into something primarily assuming it’s a Russia China thing. Now offer your perspective on what may be the resolve in Ukraine, particularly with all of this extra happening, assuming it’s probably Russia and or China and the Baltic.
JR McGee:
Well, there’s two or three things happening, Sam, that we’ve got to pay attention to, and that is Trump said he was going to end that war very quickly, and a lot of people said, oh, well he, he’s been in office three days now and it’s still going on. Well, that’s dramatically unrealistic. Zelensky has already made it clear he is willing to negotiate an end to the procedures. Putin has already indicated he’s willing to talk about it. Just in the last 48 hours, Ukraine’s been successful in recapturing some of the territory that Russia has taken, and in January alone, Russia lost 48,000 soldiers. That’s almost as many as we lost in all of Vietnam. That’s unsustainable. Russia cannot continue to sustain losses of this nature. Therefore, Putin has got to find some way to do this while saving face. And what Trump is very much aware of, he’s got to come up with a solution that lets both parties get something but allows them to save face politically and militarily so that they can claim that all of this was not for anything.
Now, the cables, there’s a large scale effort going on to cut cables, fiber optic cables, internet cables and power cables. If you stop and think about it, today’s modern society is almost completely dependent upon infrastructure that controls our electricity and our communications. Everything we have is dependent upon electricity and communications. You cut those and you undermine the very foundations. Our normal society and civilization is built upon. So these things are being rapidly done, and I think it’s a concerted effort. We haven’t had cables cut in years and now all of a sudden there’s a major rash of them, something’s going on, and in fact, Russia just claimed that two of their cables were cut. And frankly, I’m a big believer the best way to make it look like you’re not guilty is to cut your own stuff. So I think that this also is, we haven’t seen the last of this, but it’s incredibly important what’s going on. Do not underestimate how important these infrastructure cables for our internet and our electricity are. Also, the Baltics just disconnected from the Russian electrical grid this weekend. That’s huge. They’ve transitioned from getting their electricity from Russia, now they’re getting their electricity from the EU.
All of these things are happening at the speed of light, Sam.
Sam Rohrer:
Okay, and ladies and gentlemen, I hope you get all that. A lot is happening. And so in any regard, there’s a lot more I could comment on. I’ll withhold that, ask you to stay with us. Come back in the next segment, we’ll go next step into this policy, blitzrieg that we’re calling it and take a little bit further look now at the Middle East and the Trump Gaza proposal and what may or may not be happening even with Iran. Well, Jr just last week continuing. Now we’re going to move from, I’m going to say the Western Hemisphere to the Middle East, but just last week there was a meeting in the White House between the president and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. And from that meeting, truly, truly a head turning policy proposal came forth, and I think probably everyone listening to me is aware of at least components of that.
Now, it’s often referred to as the Trump Gaza proposal where the president said that the United States would take over and in his words, own the Gaza. He said he would treat it just like it has been in his past. A real estate empire has a property improvement zone. Now, later comments even yesterday indicated how we would get ahold of that ground that’s been modified a little bit now to say that Israel would actually turn over the Gaza to the United States after the war. And I see within that a lot of conditions like after the war anyways, but point being, there are some conditions that are being into this proposal, but nonetheless, Trump said that he would move out the current Palestinian reside. He’s doubled down on that and using other people’s money would build model cities, which could then be occupied by citizens of the world and nobody knows quite sure what that means.
That came up in a press conference and a journalist asked that and really wasn’t answered like, what’s a citizen of the world? But anyway, at this point, and for many reasons, no nation including Arab, at least none that I have seen so far, no European nation, no Arab nation, no nations at this point come forward and indicated their support. And I think that’s for several reasons in part devil’s into details. It’s not an actually written down proposal, it’s a concept. And so nobody’s going to sign onto that until they know more about it. But nonetheless, it is a head turning proposal with enormous implications. At least we can say that. So let me go here with you from your perspective of the strategic nature and the implications of this GA proposal. Does it connect at all to the other once we just talked about the Greenland, Canada, Mexico, Panama sweeping proposals or does it connect at least in timing, but give me your thoughts on this proposal,
JR McGee:
Sam. This is probably one of the biggest things that’s happened in my lifetime, and I think it does connect with the other ones. The Bible in particular tells us that there’s going to be a couple of world wars that come out of this. Ezekiel chapter 38 and 39 talks about a world war that’s coming out of that, and then the Book of Revelations talks about the battle of Armageddon. It’s my belief those are two separate wars. Both world wars originate out of the Middle East. Even non-believers cannot help but see how dangerous the Middle East has been for the last 60 to a hundred years. And if you’re trying to figure out how to protect your own national interests, you try to put together a plan to eliminate or mitigate any threats to your nation, even if they’re from other areas and you can’t protect the United States without trying to figure out how to resolve this issue that has the potential for creating a world war.
I think that Trump in his own way has done something that very, very few people would do, and that is he’s looked at the last 60 years and every single thing that has been done has been wrong. It has not worked. And frankly, the very people who right now are saying and screaming, oh, this can’t work. This is terrible, this is bad. The very people that messed it up beyond belief, they’re the last people I’m going to look to tell me what will and won’t work. Now by putting something on the table that is completely radically different, he’s forcing everybody to take a completely different look at this situation. Now, here’s what I believe. I believe that Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Egypt do not want the United States in Gaza without question, but they’ve not been willing to step up and do anything. In fact, they have prohibited Palestinians from relocating into their countries and there’s a reason for that.
They have not allowed anybody to go in there and pacify that area. So what Trump has done is that if you won’t do it, we will. That’s going to force those countries to stand up and take a leadership role. They will have to stand up and say, we don’t want you to do it, so we will do it. We will take those. Now I want to say something about the whole outrage over, he’s going to relocate the Palestinians. Now my heart breaks for them. I’ve spent a lot of my life in the Middle East and I understand all different sides of what’s going on and my heart breaks for the innocent Palestinians. And there are a few, there’s not a lot, but there are a few. They’ve lived their lives in refugee camps and disease and degradation and pain, but at least they had houses.
At least they had businesses, at least they had some commerce and they had jobs. If you’ve seen any photographs, any video of Gaza in the last week or two, there is nothing left, Sam. There are no homes, there’s no businesses, there’s no buildings, there’s no running water, there’s no electricity, there’s no sewage, there’s no telecommunications, there’s no support, there’s no infrastructure, there’s no place to live, and you can’t have 2 million people living on top of concrete rubble. That is the most intensely cruel thing I have ever heard anybody try to say is we’re going to force these people to live on top of concrete rubble that is inhumane. They’ve got to go somewhere. If your house or my house is damaged by fire or flood, we’ve got to move out while they repair it. It’s that simple. You can’t live in something why it’s being rebuilt. These people have got to go somewhere. You can’t have that many people living in tents for 10 to 12 years and it will take 10 to 12 years to rebuild this no matter who does it, if they’ve got to go somewhere where they can survive, if not where they are, that’s for sure.
Sam Rohrer:
Yeah, and I think JR that image, because I probably think most people if they haven’t seen it, they can easily see the pictures of what’s there and you are correct. So that presents a out of the box suggestion at least for a real problem. Now that leads me to a second part of a strategic question, and that is that Iran is a major player. They are a part of this entire thing that is there in regard to the Gaza in relationship, even to Iran because it’s kind of lumped into one thing. As we know, the president has drawn some red lines. For instance, as I listened to him, he said One thing, I will not permit Iran to become a nuclear power if Iran attempts to or actually assassinates me. This was another one I thought was interesting, either attempts to or actually assassinates me or anyone significant, and that’s not defined around me. He said, I have given the standing order to annihilate Iran. You will be annihilated. Alright, now that is one major warning and or threat. So here’s my question. From a strategic perspective, how do you analyze this threat and the drawing of the red lines? Does it actually serve to make Iran reconsider their current threats to destroy the us, the great Satan and Israel, the little Satan, or does it actually harden them and their resolve and produce a catalyst perhaps for an even firmer alliance between Iran, Turkey and the Arab Muslim world?
JR McGee:
That’s a brilliant question, Sam, and it’s a very difficult answer. For years, the United States and Russia had what was called mutually assured destruction, mad. We couldn’t attack the other one without ourselves being destroyed. Iran cannot destroy the United States, but the United States can absolutely destroy Iran. It’s not symmetrical, it’s not balanced, and Iran has suffered catastrophic losses just in the last three to four months. Hamas is an effective organization, is done for Hezbollah, is an effective organization, is done for the Houthis coming out of Yemen, and they have suffered tremendous losses and Iran themselves no longer have the capability of using proxies to fight her battles for her. And they have lost a lot of financial support for reasons that I simply do not understand. Joe Biden and his administration did everything that they could to protect Iran to include giving them large sums of money.
Trump has made it very clear the money is cut off, the protection is cut off, and they no longer have access to a lot of the things that they were going to do. We’re now going to go back and put the restrictions on them. Selling oil. Oil is the only thing Iran has to maintain her economy and these things that Trump is doing are already having dramatic effect in the Palestinian enclave. Mahmood Abbas, who’s the president of the Palestinian Authority just this morning announced they’re going to end what’s called Pay for Slay. If a terrorist blows up an Israeli, then they pay their relatives money to support them. After the terrorists is gone, it’s called Pay for Slay. Just this morning the Palestinians announced that they’re going to stop that. We’ve been trying to get them to stop that for years. It’s only through the threat of force. It’s only through credible actions that cause people to take action that you want them to go do. It’s not sanctions, it’s certainly not putting stops on money flow. It’s a credible threat of action that has credibility that people will do what they say they’re going to do. And for whatever reason people believe Trump will do this. Whether they think he’s crazy or brilliant is irrelevant. They think he will do it.
Sam Rohrer:
Okay, and with that JR, we got to wrap up this segment, but I may come back and ask you again because I know it was hard to answer. Will these threats actually be a catalyst to make Iran bow or will it be a catalyst to form a stronger hardened alliance against the us? We don’t know her yet. Ladies and gentlemen, same with us. We’ll come back and we’ll conclude some thoughts here. Well, we’re going into our final segment now and if perhaps you joined us partway through the program, again, thank you for being a part of this program. Thank you to all who write to us and give, comment, and share things that perhaps you’ve learned or that have allowed you to live a more informed, and I’m going to say in God honoring life, a lot of responses from those who are listening like that and those are wonderful.
That is our goal. I just want you to know that is our goal. This is not just a news program. This is a program in all of our Stand In the Gap radio programs and TV are geared to communicating a biblical world view and linking it to those relevant issues. Those oftentimes like when this program, headline news events that are happening around the world or domestically, but those things that impact our lives for which as believers we pray and should for wisdom and for discernment to know how to understand, as Jesus said, to be able to look at the sky at night and know what’s going to happen tomorrow. Be prepared, be forewarned, all of those things that should describe an active person who is trusting in the Lord in doing what we should in this life. All of those things are a part of why we’re doing what we’re doing.
So I just want you to know that. But if you just joined us again, this program somewhat links to a program we did on January 7th. You can go back and find it. Transcripts available on both, and I would encourage you to get a transcript. Go to our website, stand in the gap radio.com or our app, stand in the gap, listen to the program, get the transcript, read along with it and mark out things because I know many of you’re listening perhaps at places where like you’re in the car or you may be in your kitchen or somewhere else and you’re not able to write things down. That’s a great way to it. I’ll leave it there jr. Everything that we’ve commented on today are identifiable statements with some reactions by some nations and current world leaders. We haven’t touched on too much of that, but we’ve intimated some of that at this moment.
I’m going to put it this way. On the world’s stage, we often use that phrase. I’m going to say, without a doubt, Donald Trump is the main player at this point in time in this current act and scene if you’re going to put it in the perspective of a play or a drama. Yet we know biblically that what we’re witnessing is not the last scene, nor is it the final act. We know prophetically for instance, that the rapture of the church is imminent, followed by the rise of a consolidated global beast system that’s going to be part of the drama in the scenes and the acts yet to come. We can see by other world events and commitments by Trump with big tech as an example, big tech billionaires and a commitment to $500 billion of expediting of advanced AI designed to surpass China’s surveillance system in place that they’ve had there for 10 years.
And a recommitment by the President to comprehensive and dangerous mRNA shots with big pharma. While some things like we’ve talked today about are good and are clearly occurring, there’s also a concerning policy thread that I’ve evidenced mentioned some here that’s also being woven into this developing braided rope policy of change. That’s how I’m viewing it. One part offers a connection to a promise life raft, good and encouraging. The other to me promises the rope, perhaps the ability to hang those who oppose and it’s concerning and potentially not so good. So we’re in extremely perilous times where all of God’s people must be alert to pray for wisdom and discernment. And as the apostle John says in one John four, to test the spirits for the spirit of antichrist is already in the world beginning all the way back when the Lord ascended up to this point and John says the antichrist himself is coming with the system. So Jr, this is a big backdrop and I lay that out there as just my brief comments, but how about you now let me move to you. What concluding comments would you share relative to your strategic thoughts as you’ve already expressed, but then anchored with biblical truth and biblical worldview? How do we take and put all this together and then back up a little bit and say, right now, based on these things in a biblical worldview, how should we proceed?
JR McGee:
You asked me a question in the last segment and I didn’t complete my answer, and that was how is this thing with Iran? Is it just a one shot thing? Is it going to solidify them or is it going to cause them to further decay? Here’s the thing, the human part of me believes that Iran should back off and slow down and what we would consider come to their senses. But what we’ve seen in the last six months is this alliance that the Bible talks about to include Turkey and Russia has come together. Now they’ve suffered some serious setbacks, but that alliance is going to continue and it’s going to develop and it’s going to grow, it’s going to metastasize. So where we would think that all of these things should cause Iran to back up and slow down, what I think is going to happen both strategically and biblically, this is one area where they absolutely align.
I think over the next four to eight years, you’re going to see this alliance build and grow and become a very dangerous component that does attack Israel, just like the Bible said, and frankly I can see where this initiative with Gaza and getting other organizations and other countries to come in and develop that and grow that and pacify that could reach the point where Israel could say, ah, now we’re living in peace and safety. We’ve finally gotten there and that’s what the Bible says is going to occur. But that’s where things get truly dangerous. Sam, I’m seeing things come together that show me that the actions that you can see in real life and by reading the newspaper are lining up precisely with what the Bible says is going to occur. And I think that all of these actions are good, they’re necessary, but they’re laying the groundwork for this alliance to come together that’s ultimately going to attack Israel and lead to God, showing the whole world who he is, that he is all powerful, that he protects Israel, not the United States, not other countries.
He does, and it’s happening in real time and people with eyes to see, and ears to hear should be able to see these things and pick it out. Now, what that requires is paying attention. You can’t look at these things five minutes a day or just look at the news as you’re eating dinner and stay on top of this to understand what’s truly going on. You’ve got to be engaged, you’ve got to be paying attention. It takes a lot to figure these things out and put these pieces together and see how the Middle East connects with the Panama Canal, which connects with Greenland, which connects with Canada, which connects with everything that Trump and his team are doing to try to find a way to secure the national interests of the United States and protect our people. But the Bible’s got a word to say on this, and we better pay to exactly what the Bible says because the Bible is true.
Anybody who cannot read the Bible and say, okay, I can see that either is not paying attention or is being willfully ignorant. I think just like I’ve said in the past, you’ve got to look at the source. See, has that source been accurate in the past? Figure out, can I trust these people? Can I trust this source? Are they telling me the truth? Does it fit with everything else that I know? And most importantly, does this align with the word of God? Test the messenger, test the method, test the motive, and always be aware false profits are going to sound perfectly legitimate.
Sam Rohrer:
And with that, JR, we’re just simply out of time. We’re simply out of time. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for being with us today, Jr. Thank you for being with us. We really could use two hours or three, but we only have this one and we’re at the end of it now. Thanks for being again with us. You can go back, pick up this program and it’s transcript on Stand in the gap radio.com and join us tomorrow. Jamie Mitchell will be here and I’ll be back with you on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday.
Recent Comments